Harsh..
hey keep in mind, some people ARE stressed and have different ways of relieving that
like taking it out on people from a site that aren't helping them
well, if they can't read it, then ... they should just try harder to make sense of it
i had to make sense of their stupid questions, the least they can do is read my answers properly
:rolleyes:
Said it before, I'll say it again
I think there have been changes to the syllabus for a reason, like they took out the parts of the syllabus which they have problems with
I actually would've preferred an essay, it gives me a specific structure to follow.
I always feel clumsy writing things like conversations/personal letters/diary entries.
No you're not wrong. The beauty of english is that each text is open to personal interprettation, and if you had sufficient reasoning for your claim, i'm sure you did fine. Don't even worry about it! :)
What surprised me actually was the extra text
But then, on second thought, if they had left it with the first three texts only, then my creative writing bit would have suffered alot--I wrote to the web site designer
I didn't notice a difference in the paper.. it felt the same to me..
I prefer to use felt tip pen, because that glides over ANY kind of paper--and surprisingly it didnt go through the page :)
I do speeches, and I fully talked about technique
I made my convo b/w two teachers teaching the course, and so that let me get away with alot IMO
Anyway, how could you NOT have studied Lincoln's speech?!
It was SO obvious that that would be specified! i mean, following sep. 11 and the...
I wrote an into covering the question, put my practice essay and conclusion re-stating the into
did you guys use three related texts?
it said "at least TWO related texts" which usually means three