Search results

does any1 hava copy of the short answers they can put up. thanx

Number 5 race 3 at flemington on thursday! Oh u mean bio unless u like it n really enjoy it get out y u can!

the test was as bout as fair and as difficuly as the last 3-4 years so i would say scaling would be about the same. raw mark of 72-3% = 80(band5) raw mark of 83%=90 (band 6)

I thought the 8 mark question was more about validity and that crap because the key word they used was 'assess' not 'describe'. anyone else agree?

i wrote bout whopping cough,was that right?????????

get the discussion happening in the exam thoughts aye so i can see how shit i went!:wave:

you dont loose marks but if they cant quite get the concept ur trying to make and its marked on the diagram then they can give u marks!

its gota be without replacement otherwise they would of stated. they cant exactly assume that you know if the squares are on a chessboard can be moved coz its not in the syllabus!

89-92

with those marks i would say mid band 5. i think i am around the same area so iam hoping it scales to bout 83-85

I dont think you had to discuss elements of a training session i.e skill instruction, warm up cool down, conditioning etc.

Notice a few people have had mixed views about this question especially the word Distinguish. The question was something like distinguish between immediate physiological response to training and physiological adaptation to aerobic training. Just wondering wat everyone wrote for this. by...

from the syllabus establishing training programs -determined by phases of competition -linked to long-term training plans, eg year, season - designed to optimise the performance of athletes e.g individual, team - data gathering and analysis of training and performance i managed to right 4 and...

Correct Multiple Choice answers- care to critisise 1. d - its in the text book and on dictionary.com cant complain with that 2. b - contributes to CVD, lung cancer, asthma 3. a - obviously its the only priorty area there 4. a 5. c 6. b - trends have decreased in males and females 7. b 8. a 9...

1. d 2. b 3. a 4. a 5. c 6. b 7. b 8. a 9. c 10. a 11. c -it wrong i did mc at the end n after 6 hours wasnt thinking strait 12. a 13. c 14. d 15. b 16. d 17. c 18. d 19. d 20. d

Yeh i did totaps and applied into mostly hard tissue injuries since there the only ones u can examine the extent and nautre of the injury through signs and symptoms, but also include some of soft tissue. I recon 16+ for this section.

clarify how the nature and extent of injuries are determined? what did you talk about? what were we surpose to talk about?

Yeh thats what i put less that 5 solar masses and a main sequence star. I left it and then looked at the next question and it said greater than 10 solar masees. Its definately not 1 sollar masses cos thats a white dwarf and wouldnt be situated on the main sequence of the HR diagram.

I am sure u got 99%. Einstein himself would only get 98%. He didnt know the photoelectric effect question!

I recon 70% is realistic. Low-mid band 5 Normally 65% scales to a low band 5. i think this test was very similar in difficulty with the 2004 test so i think between 65-70% will see a band 5.