Search results

I'm sure he was thinking about conception as it would be view by outside forces.... not by sperm. You know... possessing individual things with cool names doesn't mean that they're all working the way they do in a fully developed human. We're much more complicated/require more to work than...

he wants you.

I don't know what evidence it would take to convince me, I'm sure God does tho, right?

I don't even know what it is that I wrote, that you're responding to. But we have no evidence-based reason to imagine that there was a creator. It's like me hypothesising that evil demons give people aids, can you disprove it? No. Does the fact that you can't disprove it make it any more...

Ok, sure thing, in your deluded world that's the way it is. It doesn't matter that it doesn't have a conclusion, nor does it matter that science has yet to come up with a perfect natural explanation for the 'beginning of creation'. The only question in this thread, as far as I can see, is...

You said this before, I responded. Personally, I think the 'prooving' of whether or not it is moral to allow abortion is much harder than proving one way or another if God exists. Essentially the debate about whether God exists is as difficult as the debate about whether santa/the tooth...

Yea I am too. Which means her menstration started quite early, but I don't know how rare that is.

Yea I agree.. the jews own the land, because they own the land. Maybe you want to claim you have a historical/ethical right to the land or whatever, but if you don't have the force/support (economic, militarily, politically) to back it up, it's nothing but hot air. Anyway, while I agree with...

Except the problem for you is that nothing supernatural has ever came to be true, at least that we have a record of. Also, it's not just going against 'common sense', it's going against years of investigative studies into paranormal nonsense - all of which (if serious) came up with null results...

LMFAO. You have no idea what 'caused' it. I'm going to blame it on YOU, you monster. What they don't want to tell you is that it's most likely not a mystery, but a forgery as many other examples of this shit have been.

It's natural for people to feel more for similar people than those who appear different. Also, it's a movie, the entire experience is designed to play on people's emotions, it's upsetting to watch a movie documenting the life/death of a single person. We cry at our grannys funeral, we might cry...

I have no real problem with the name to be honest... If a resturant started up a 'bin laden's bar & brill' down the road from me I'd probably just wanna check it out because it sounds cool.

To be fair, he isn't the ONLY cleric in the religion and I have heard others on the radio saying they'd like to talk with him to explain to him why his view of the religion is wrong.

I'm not supportive of reproductive cloning or creating half-human hybrids... I don't see the relevance.

What, exactly, is your point?

Humans have sex thousands of times throughout their life... only one of these times is often needed to be with the opposite sex, to create a baby. Also, with sperm doners etc - I can't find a lesbian that isn't pregnant.

Why do you think these scientists want to use them then?

Why can't we change the definition? Marriage is just a concept we've created.

lol.

Where exactly did you get that statistic from? Just because a child performs lower in an IQ test than the other doesn't mean imo that their 'intelligence' is necessarily less than that other child , some people don't have mathematical ability but might be quite gifted in the arts... other people...