Search results

I am just curious at a few things after realing your post.. I am not questioning your believes as I have my own believes and I have no doubts where it will take me, but I would like to challenge your believe (sincerely) because I do not find it convincing :) And I'll do so by asking you a few...

It occurs to me that people who have created and supported (are supporting) the evolution theory produced solid evidence and facts based on logical inferences. If such logical inference is a "logical fallacy", does that mean murderers who have no witnesses for their crimes should not be accused...

are you tempting me to spam? I won't do it.... yes it's lemonade xD

There ish no fallacy in because we, scientists, know that it's a theory.. On the other hand, those who don't know or those who have other believes are immediately disgusted at our theory because of their predisposed believes that were written down by (according to my opinion) great...

*spams* well, lovely edanomel is immortal!.. nothing was harmed in the hypothesis... btw, has anyone figured out why edanomel yet?

:p well, I clicked on your link and I happened to be there before.. First of all did you actually read the whole thing? If you did, you must have realised that only the top 10 lines or so are about Na-24 and the rest is about the non-radioactive Na isotope.. :) Secondly.. and the most amusing...

Hmm.. I think it's a common fallacy that when something has come into contact with radioactive material then it will also become radioractive if the source has enough energy to make something radioactive? Say we take a hypothetical immortal creature (very friendly and loves to help...

I guess she hasn't... xD and that's upsetting... And.. btw, what I meant in my previous post is not about doing what you want but more like attempt to do what you want.. And this: is very true :p Hello XDDD I ish a big Bill Evans Fan ^__________^

For open minded people: Indeedy =x I wholeheartly support his arguement.. but I find it impossible to discuss evolutionism with people who believes in creationalism.. They always try to critise our break-down approach and they will keep asking questions like - "egg came first or chicken came...

Umm.. no, totally not agree - I don't believe a million would rain on me if I don't work for it.. Life is not what it is, it is what you want it to be Don't listen to cactus :p eh.. sorry for double posting..

*tut tut tut* You people are surely naughty xD She's asking us "how to get a guy to like her" not "how to get a guy in bed"... Well, doggie, getting someone you love to fall in love with you is just the better part of being in love with *that someone* (apart from the fact that breaking up...

The old me.. Reminder: it takes more than oneperson to do it.. make it my last post on this thread..

Fiddling wasn't exactly the word to describe it.. but alrighty =x no fiddling.. (seriously, that sounded better...) *throws tonnes of apology on top of nit* I did have that in mind... =x mixed up with yield the moment I typed it *frown* oh well... what's done is done... finds more...

arrrg... omgeeez x______X I had that in mind before I posted and forgot about it and let the stupid process took over (wait.. not supid.. fun things to do with ammonia..) I did did did did did have that in mind and I was going to say it.. *sigh.. very embarrassing* thannks for the correction...

well... I just love it.. I'm not sure if that's an entirely right thing to say about catalysts.. If it's about cost then the whole process will be taken into account - I imagine that might be some expensive catalysts that are desingned solely for lowering the required the starting energy...

It's actually not much different to BSc. for the time being the only differences I know are: 1. there are compulsory courses other than those specified in the BSc. program 2. it leads directly to an honour year if you achieve an average of over 65 for each session Besides.. I still suck...

Yup, you're right, it's not in the HSC syllabus but it never hurts to know more :) Nit: Thank you again :) but I went "ooooh... cr*p" (Piper from Charmed in the excalibur episode) when I found out that mine it's a 6th edition.. looks like I have got some reading to do with this headache...

^____________^ gracias mucho... ummm... is it page 3... 3... three hundred and something in McMurray? I don't seem to find that much detail in McMurray... headache doesn't help..

Weeeeeeell.. I think it's just a matter of personal favourites, as I have already said don't take my ranting too personally ;) don't you think referring dreameaver to as god is too much of a.. hyperbole? ^____________^ I think I'm going to vote for notepad soon enough when I get the hang of...

Isn't this reaction an E2 reaction? Bimolecular... I thought whether a reaction is E1 or E2 has nothing to do with how many steps it undergoes.. What steps anyway?