Search results

well either i totally stuffed that bit up, but i thought by transportation, it meant transportation of electricity, as in, with superconductive wires, you don't need very thick wires, and no heat is lost, because of the superconductive properties etc. does anyone use the jacaranda physics...

nice afnya, i might see ya there!

yeah, i said they filled it out wrong too

notice that was 2 years ago - THE OLD HSC!! thie NEW one is pretty different with scaling etc i think

i'm thinking you can't take any idea of how good you are at software engineering from a BOS test! i enjoy the programming, my major project was pretty good - even if it was in VB, but most of the course was jsut what ethical and social aspects are involved, with a little bit of programming -...

yeah, i think i did something like that too, but you don't know if it reads the time and date off the main computer...once again its to ambiguous

Are people going to study software engineering at uni next year? if so, where abouts, i spose most of you are in sydney anyone going to ANU in canberra?

10 is D, cause 'the software developer' produces the programs, so he wouldn't say, do it yourself and don't pay me. the end-user is not making hte program, so its RAD

ha! physics is pretty easy now, its just all text book stuff. well most of the trials were anyway, i got 93% raw in my trial, it was so easy. i'm taking the w/end off, and doing work next week

somehow i think its a little hard to judge your performance in this exam!

15 is A, cause the books always go on about how communication is vital, and you wouldn't want to stop letting the client have a say about their product. its deffinately A

no, it won't print i dont think, it'll just keep looping indefinately, so jam the system. to print, it has to get into ProcessTicket, which it can't if the message isn't 'TICKET'

i'm first in the year for SDD at my school, and i still wasn't planning SDD to count

yeah, it is set too high, but even to get a band 5 last year you had to be in the top 7-8% of the state. its pretty rediculous

for question 23a) i basically said there was no error handling if the wroing message header was read, so i put one in. i was working on that bit for ages, cause there was no obvious error, apart from that one. although i can hardly believe those remote computers would enter anything else but the...

i put c) probably cause i do IT aswell, so you need proper maintenance etc for it

now reading it, it does sound right, cause you have to use all 'eight data bits' in each packet

yeah, i did exactly the same as blah in the exam, but i'm now not sure if its right, i got the remainder as 12 too

yeah, i'm with everyone else, 3 algorithms is way too much for the time we got, especially since it finished at 5! it was just question 23a) and i won't get full marks for that 6mark algorithm in 23b)! and i now wish i did the evolution option, not hardware, the algorithm wasn't too bad, but...

yeah, for 1 i put d) and 2 c) i think i put 3A) aswell, which i know is wrong, but all the others i did the same - it was just those first few that were the doozies