MedVision ad

Search results

  1. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new The scare is over everyone. sensitivity is low (lindzen 2009) . temperatures are not outside of the range of natural variability. models are useless and moreover, atmospheric carbon dioxide...
  2. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new No viable alternative
  3. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new Rising CO2 emissions is generally beneficial to the ocean life. Ocean acidification can be problematic, but there are two issues which are important. 1 - To what extent is man the cause of the increased...
  4. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new I am not proffering any opinion i'm simply providing facts. You did obviously misinterpret the article as you asserted that this article refuted my claim that 'Carbon dioxide is in no way harmful to the...
  5. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new 1. You have completely misinterpreted the essence of the article, however, i still challenge the vague way in which it is written. Observe the actual article - degradation of the world's coral reefs has...
  7. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new Firstly to 'coming up for air', remember emission cuts are on 1990 levels not current levels, so it is inaccurate to suggest that "3%*1.5%*5*= a 0.00225% reduction in global emissions" Secondly, Lets...
  8. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new Define: Pollution - undesirable state of the natural environment being contaminated with harmful substances as a consequence of human activities. Carbon dioxide is in no way harmful to the environment...
  9. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new As I said before, please spread the news that even with a higher target say 80% reductions in emissions, this would only effect a maybe, if the science is accurate, a potential 0.0001- 0.001°c reduction in...
  10. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new There is no reason why incentive based action should not be encouraged as good environmental practice. How about we endeavour to make our households, businesses and industries more EFFICIENT, prevent...
  11. V

    Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new tax

    Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new You don't have to be a sceptic to realise that an ETS is ineffective. Do some research and you would realise that even if we are to accept the dubious science, even if the entire world were to adopt a...
  13. V

    Best degrees for atheists who want to debate creationists?

    We have a little thing called freedom of speech. Dip shit.
Top