a polynomials question (1 Viewer)

spice girl

magic mirror
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
785
Because "OLDMAN" is complaining about the lack of problems, I've decided to cause one myself...

Prove that x^3 + 3px^2 + 3qx + r has a double root if and only if:

(pq - r)^2 = 4(p^2 - q)(q^2 - pr)

Enjoy :p
 

OLDMAN

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
251
Location
Mudgee
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I think this is the sort of slanging match that frightens a lot of students from posting their genuine problems. This problem is going to be messy because of the X^2 term.

3x^2+6px+3q=0 if double root.... p'(x)=0
therefore x^2=q-2px (1)
sub. into p(x), (q-2px)x+3p(q-2px)+3qx+r=0
qx-2px^2+3pq-6p^2x+3qx+r=0
which gives 2px^2=x(4q-6p^2)+3pq+r (2)
using (1) for x^2 , 2pq-4p^2x=x(4q-6p^2)+3pq+r
x(2p^2-4q)=pq+r giving x=(pq+r)/(2p^2-4q)

substituting this x into (2) gives the required identity, might post this first before I lose it.
 

OLDMAN

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
251
Location
Mudgee
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
continuation.....

((pq+r)/(2p^2-4q))^2=q-2p(pq+r)(2p^2-4q)
(pq+r)^2=q(2p^2-4q)^2-2p(pq+r)(2p^2-4q)
=2(p^2-2q)(q(2p^2-q)-2p(pq+r))
=2(p^2-2q)(-q^2-2pr)
=2(2q-p^2)(q^2+2pr)

which gets a different result, but the methodology is true.
 

spice girl

magic mirror
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
785
Originally posted by OLDMAN
I think this is the sort of slanging match that frightens a lot of students from posting their genuine problems.
[to OLDMAN] slanging match?

umm...yeh oldman's soln is the usual approach and should always work unless the question is really a bitch. In summary the cookbook is as follows:
1) Differentiate
2) Sub in
3) repeat (2) until the solution comes out.


but this one has an alternative solution which is really fun to read so that's prolly why i posted it...

involves heaps of elegant elimination that ends up with a linear equation in x. Lots of algebra though.
 

OLDMAN

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
251
Location
Mudgee
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
That's right, Spice Girl, its a standard approach. And what may be standard approach to you, might still not be standard approach for a struggling YR12. It is sad to see this Ext2 forum degenerate into "who can post the smartest question" rather than a sincere forum for helping young YR12s.
 

OLDMAN

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
251
Location
Mudgee
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Befor SpiceGirl puts up his alternative sol. Here is the standard method cleared up of numerical errors.

x^3+3px^2+3qx+r=0 (1)
3x^2+6px+3q=0 (2) p'x=0
from (2) x^2=-q-2px (3)
sub. into 1
-qx-2px^2-3pq-6p^2x+3qx+r=0
2px^2=r-3pq+(2q-6p^2)x (4)
2px^2=-2pq-4p^2x being (3)*2 (5)
(4)=(5) gives x=(r-pq)/2(p^2-q)
sub. into (3) (pq-r)^2/4(p^2-q)^2=-q-2p(r-pq)/2(p^2-q)
(pq-r)^2=-4(p^2-q)^2-4p(p^2-q)(r-pq)
=4(p^2-q)(-p^q+q^2-pr+p^2q)
=4(p^2-q)(q^2-pr)
 

spice girl

magic mirror
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
785
I think I'll let people have a shot at the question, so I'll make up a set of follow-up questions so it's easier:

NB: on second thoughts I don't think this is ~elegant~ but it's always nice to have alternatives.

Consider x^3 + 3px^2 + 3qx + r = 0 ...[1] has a double root, called alpha.

i) Explain why alpha is also a root of x^2 + 2px + q = 0 ...[2]
ii) Using [1] and [2] show that px^2 + 2qx + r = 0 ...[3]
iii) Using [2] and [3] show that (p^2 - q)x^2 + (pr - q^2) = 0 ...[4]
iv) Using [2] and [3] show that 2(p^2 - q)x + (pq - r) = 0 ...[5]
v) Hence show that (pq - r)^2 = 4(p^2 - q)(q^2 - pr)
 
N

ND

Guest
i)
If alpha is a double root for P(x), it is also a root at P'(x)=x^2 + 2px + q = 0 ...[2]
ii)
x^2 + 2px + q = 0
x^2 = -q -2px
sub into [1] (because i'm lazy, i'm not going to write every line)
-2px^2 + 2px -6p^2x -3pq + r = 0, now add [2] * -3p
px^2 + 2qx + r = 0 ...[3]
iii)
[2] * q - [3] * p = (p^2 - q)x^2 + (pr - q^2) = 0 ...[4]
iv)
[2] * p - [3] = 2(P^2 - q)x + px - r = 0 ...[5]
v)
from [5]:
(pq - r)^2 = 4(p^2 - q)^2*x^2 ...[6]
from [4]:
x^2 = (q^2 - pr)/(p^2 - q)
sub into [6]:
(pq - r)^2 = 4(p^2 - q)(q^2 - pr)

I wouldn't have been able to do that without all the separate parts.
 

spice girl

magic mirror
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
785
Sorry...sorry...
the sub-questions should be reworded to say prove alpha is also a root of [3], [4], [5]....

but close enough...
 

OLDMAN

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
251
Location
Mudgee
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Just a note on the standard approach. The steps are pretty straightforward and it will always deliver -for a 3rd degree polynomial. Just to recap, find x^2 in linear term ie mx+b;sub into p(x), find x^2; equate the two expressions, to solve for x. Now you can mention to the examiner that this x is the double root, so no need to mention alpha, just use x.
If the polynomial is 4th degree, the corresponding steps will produce a quadratic equation, one of the roots of which will be the repeated root.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top