• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Arrested by AFP (1 Viewer)

~ari

is well hung
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
83
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
What happens if you get arrested and charged but never got cautioned?
 

historykidd

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
365
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2007
~ari said:
What happens if you get arrested and charged but never got cautioned?
lulz owned

what did you do?

the only time i've been arrested i was granted a warning rather than a caution

wouldn't have a fucking clue if that applies here but
 

~ari

is well hung
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
83
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
historykidd said:
lulz owned

what did you do?

the only time i've been arrested i was granted a warning rather than a caution

wouldn't have a fucking clue if that applies here but
I'm talking about a 'right to remain silent etc' caution not a 'don't do it again little man' caution
 

historykidd

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
365
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2007
~ari said:
I'm talking about a 'right to remain silent etc' caution not a 'don't do it again little man' caution
well that sounds a bit more serious :| sorry mate im utterly useless here. :cold:
 

~ari

is well hung
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
83
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Crimes against the Commonwealth aren't THAT serious
 

= Jennifer =

Active Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Messages
2,466
Location
sydney's inner west
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
If an AFP check is done on you, it will appear on your record. At my work we request a lot of AFP checks on clients and even if you get arrested it appears.
 

hfis

Dyslexic Fish
Joined
Aug 5, 2004
Messages
876
Location
Not China
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
~ari said:
I'm talking about a 'right to remain silent etc' caution not a 'don't do it again little man' caution
If your matter goes to trial, then anything you did or said after arrest may not be used as evidence against you. It's a pretty serious oversight.

See s 139 (1), Evidence Act 1995 (Cth).

Edit; I should probably point out that, under s 138 of the same act, if you're obviously guilty and it's in the interests of justice to disregard the lack of caution, the Court will do just that. However, this is a pretty difficult test to satisfy, and the odds are well in your favour.
 
Last edited:

Timbo650

Supposed to be studying
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
80
Location
Hills District
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
~ari said:
What happens if you get arrested and charged but never got cautioned?
1. If you got arrested and charged then you (mostly) go to court.

2. What did you do that the Feds arrested you, rather than NSWP?
(I am assuming that you were arrested by FAs and not by ACT uniformed police)

3. If you were in law "arrested", then clearly you got bail, so what is your problem?

4. Chances are that you were not "arrested", thus were not cautioned.

5. If you gave the cops a dose of mouth, then be grateful that you still have all your teeth.

6. While there is a common law duty to caution an arrested person, "Mirandising" like you see on American cop shows generally does not happen.
 

*1984*

New Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
3
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Timbo650 said:
16. While there is a common law duty to caution an arrested person, "Mirandising" like you see on American cop shows generally does not happen.
23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
(1) Subject to subsection (3), if a person is under arrest or a protected suspect, an investigating official must, before starting to question the person, caution the person that he or she does not have to say or do anything, but that anything the person does say or do may be used in evidence.

Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth)
 

Timbo650

Supposed to be studying
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
80
Location
Hills District
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
*1984* said:
23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
(1) Subject to subsection (3), if a person is under arrest or a protected suspect, an investigating official must, before starting to question the person, caution the person that he or she does not have to say or do anything, but that anything the person does say or do may be used in evidence.

Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth)

Look at what said.
I did not say "the law does not require..."
I said that it generally didn't happen. By which I mean IRL and regardless of what the law requires.

And the OP hasn't exactly answered the original questions...
 

hfis

Dyslexic Fish
Joined
Aug 5, 2004
Messages
876
Location
Not China
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Timbo650 said:
Look at what said.
I did not say "the law does not require..."
I said that it generally didn't happen. By which I mean IRL and regardless of what the law requires.

And the OP hasn't exactly answered the original questions...
I highly doubt this. As far as the courts are concerned, anything that's said without a caution was never said at all. If this was truly the case, then anyone who knew a friend-of-a-friend's second cousin who's a lawyer specializing in conveyancing would be able to get off.

It doesn't matter what 'common practice' for the police happens to be. The courts take the rights of the accused extremely seriously, and the case law and legislation reflects this. The police are not so stupid as to disregard it.
 

Timbo650

Supposed to be studying
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
80
Location
Hills District
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
hfis said:
I highly doubt this. As far as the courts are concerned, anything that's said without a caution was never said at all. If this was truly the case, then anyone who knew a friend-of-a-friend's second cousin who's a lawyer specializing in conveyancing would be able to get off.

It doesn't matter what 'common practice' for the police happens to be. The courts take the rights of the accused extremely seriously, and the case law and legislation reflects this. The police are not so stupid as to disregard it.
< shrug >

I do not claim to be black-letter right.
Nor do I say that you are in any respect black-letter wrong.

But do, please, consider the possibility that I know stuff that you don't.
 

incentivation

Hmmmmm....
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
558
Location
Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Timbo650 said:
4. Chances are that you were not "arrested", thus were not cautioned.
From my understanding and interpretation of the Evidence Act, the concept of arrest is not merely confined to the black letter idea of communicating 'you are are under arrest'..

The very fact that he was charged with an offence clearly shows that at some point, the officers were under the belief that there was sufficient evidence to establish that he committed the offence, and thus under arrest in accordance with the act..
 

Timbo650

Supposed to be studying
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
80
Location
Hills District
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
incentivation said:
The very fact that he was charged with an offence clearly shows that at some point, the officers were under the belief that there was sufficient evidence to establish that he committed the offence, and thus under arrest in accordance with the act..
I concur. Consider also that the AFP will often proceed via summons, and/or will often seek an arrest warrant, rather than exercise their "traditional" power to arrest on suspicion without a warrant.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top