Completed Solutions (1 Viewer)

tim_dawborn

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
41
Total SOLUTIONS FOR 2005 HSC PAPER

this is my solutions - possibly some mistakes - the corrections are in trhe latter end of the other solutions thread

plz post some feedback and comments on your thorts and results of the paper
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EvilDude

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
18
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
3aii - it is between 0.7 and 0.75 therefore to 1dp is just 0.7
dii - you want the smallest l for x is still real. That is b^2 - 4ac > 0
so b^2 > 4ac
but we want smallest b^2, occurs when b^2 = 4ac
l^2 = 4(12)
l = root(48) = 4 root(3)
7bii
I did this graphically.
Drew a general cubic (with A>0) and then you can see that if the second stationary point is above the y axis, then the cubic will only have one real root.

From here it's some working based on proving that the stationary point (x = root(3)/3) lies above y axis for A<3root3/2

Thanks for solutions, helped me find a few of my stupid mistakes, so now no high expectations.
 

HSCExamMarker

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
26
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
My answers are all same except for the question 7(a)
coz i could not do it..

omg althought i am first in 4unit and got like 92in trials...suddenly my mind was blocked at that question...I feel so bad that i missed easy stuff..

otherwise, most of them are same and the one with x^2-lx+12=0
u simply differentiate to find a minimum point then sub in
although i made STUPID arithmetic mistake in this

I am not sure about that Q7(b) too..coz i could not figure out..
I really liked to hav hard but straightfoward questions..oh well..not happened.

Any find difficulty with 7(a) ? or it's only me -_- lol
 

HSCExamMarker

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
26
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
By the way for Q7a. ii) i just wrote down
dr/da = da/dt * dr/da
and therefore dr/da = 0.02 * dr/da
but not caculated coz i could not do (i)
would i get ANY mark for writing this down??
 

EvilDude

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
18
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
HSCExamMarker said:
By the way for Q7a. ii) i just wrote down
dr/da = da/dt * dr/da
and therefore dr/da = 0.02 * dr/da
but not caculated coz i could not do (i)
would i get ANY mark for writing this down??
I think you'd need more work for a mark, as it's only worth 2 and one mark might be for answer while the other for the differentiation etc.
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Q7b ii

0 < A(1/3^(3/2)) - A/3^(1/2) + 1
A(1/3^(1/2) - 1/3^(3/2) < 1
A((3 - 1)/3^3/2) < 1
A(2/3^(3/2)) < 1
A < 3^(3/2)/2
A < 3.3^(1/2) /2


theres actually 2 ways to do this to get u the answer!!
either minimum value is bigger than or max is less than
(i did the max is less than version in the above working)

wow if onyl that question was worth more marks...

why couldnt anyone picture this?
if the minimum is above the root then there will only be one real root..
 
Last edited:

datacore

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
20
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
for the volumes question i think i had something like this


...

= pi/2 (pi/8 - 1/4) <-- which is the correct answer
but then i decided to simplify it

= pi^2 / 18 - pi/8

so do you think i would lose a mark
 

EvilDude

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
18
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I think I did the same, just worked in a different direction. I used a substitution in A to show it had to be minimum value instead of proving it like that though.
 

gemblack88

New Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
24
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
HSCExamMarker said:
By the way for Q7a. ii) i just wrote down
dr/da = da/dt * dr/da
and therefore dr/da = 0.02 * dr/da
but not caculated coz i could not do (i)
would i get ANY mark for writing this down??
yeh thats exactly what i did for that question. i reckon there's a chance we could get a mark for that...
 

tez0r

Rawr?
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
387
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
hmmm..but don't they take all of your working into consideration?
 

mnanda88

New Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21
Location
nsw, australia
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
hey it says ur file is like zippd

ahh i want da answers ... i culdnt get in2 ur file phoenix88 ...
yay no more maths ... :( awww i failed
 

oneeye

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2005
Messages
1
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
haboozin said:
Q7b ii

0 < A(1/3^(3/2)) - A/3^(1/2) + 1
A(1/3^(1/2) - 1/3^(3/2) < 1
A((3 - 1)/3^3/2) < 1
A(2/3^(3/2)) < 1
A < 3^(3/2)/2
A < 3.3^(1/2) /2


theres actually 2 ways to do this to get u the answer!!
either minimum value is bigger than or max is less than
(i did the max is less than version in the above working)

wow if onyl that question was worth more marks...

why couldnt anyone picture this?
if the minimum is above the root then there will only be one real root..
What about
0 < A(-(1/3^(3/2))) - A/-(3^(1/2)) + 1
Giving
A >- 3.3^(1/2) /2
and when A=0 there are on zeros as f(x) =1.
Therefore one zero only when 0< absolute A <3.3^(1/2) /2.

Also, shouldn't the question have said one REAL zero?
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Observe that a cubic has only one root when the local minimum occurs above y=0 (that is both stat points occur above y=0), or when the local maximum occurs below y=0.

f(sqrt3/3)= Asqrt3/9 – Asqrt3/3 + 1 = 1 - 2Asqrt3/9
f(-sqrt3/3)= 1 + 2Asqrt3/9

f(x) is cubic and leading coefficient is positive, thus f(-sqrt3/3) is the max and f(sqrt3/3) is the min.

Now from the observation above:
1 + 2Asqrt3/9 < 0 or
1 - 2Asqrt3/9 > 0
That is:
A < -3sqrt3/2 or
A < 3sqrt3/2
Since A>0 (given), it must be 0 < A < 3sqrt3/2. #
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
oneeye said:
Also, shouldn't the question have said one REAL zero?
no because the 3unit syllabus only deals with real numbers.
So to them complex numbers are non existant and they wouldnt confuse students because of that.

if this was a 4unit exam then it would defenatly say REAL.
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
also for Q6 ii - it should be tan ( 180 - @) not 360 - @... it gives the right answer but the way gone about it is wrong
 

tim_dawborn

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
41
haboozin said:
also for Q6 ii - it should be tan ( 180 - @) not 360 - @... it gives the right answer but the way gone about it is wrong
u sure ?? if it was tan(180 - @) that would imply that the particle was moving upwards and to the left; whereas teh particle is moving downwards and to the right
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
phoenix88 said:
u sure ?? if it was tan(180 - @) that would imply that the particle was moving upwards and to the left; whereas teh particle is moving downwards and to the right
but does direction matter?
gradient is done by the angle the line makes with the horisontal...

can either be obtuse or accute... in this case its obtuse.

so the angle is 180 - @ which give u the obtuse angle the line makes to the horisontal.
 

justchillin

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
You just make it accute with the verticle velocity negative...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top