effectiveness of the legal system (1 Viewer)

[SKA]

effectiveness of the legal system- someone help me before i shoot myself

well we know this is usually allways one of the choice extended responses always put in. i sat down to evaluate the effectiveness of the family court but i dont know where to start..

do i put it paragraphs of say.... equality, resource efficiency, etc.

or what do i do??


please someone help me ... ive done these things a million times and i still dont know what im doing

 

[vanillalatte]

For family court, id suggest evluations like its advantages, disadvantages which include cost, delay etc and whether all members of the society have even access to resources eg legal aid, representation etc. You might also wanna include that the recognition of specialisation allowed minorities of the society, eg women n refugees more rights and access to legal mechanisms.
yeah basically thats all i included coz this is not a very major part in my essay. =)

 

[SKA]

For family court, id suggest evluations like its advantages, disadvantages which include cost, delay etc and whether all members of the society have even access to resources eg legal aid, representation etc. You might also wanna include that the recognition of specialisation allowed minorities of the society, eg women n refugees more rights and access to legal mechanisms.
yeah basically thats all i included coz this is not a very major part in my essay. =)

aiight thanks.. .so basically i structure my paragraphs in issues and the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of those issues?

 

[vanillalatte]

yes i think so thats basically what u're required to do for evluating effective or something. however i dont think they'll ask u to evaluate the family court alone. so yeah dont worry too much about it.

 

[aLeeOh!]

i agree...
not on the family court alone.

facous on the ISSUES.. and the effectiveness of the legal system in responsding to these

 

[Espo15]

Yeah they'll cover more in the Q than just family court. But you should cover the history (i.e. how it was created, what acts etc) its jurisdiction, its positives and negatives etc, and relate each point back to negative or positive efficiency.

 

[aLeeOh!]

how much "history" though do you think they'll expect?

i find that sometimes, many people are in danger of giving a recount/ report almost like a history essay or something, forgetting they have to DISCUSS or EVALUATE.

 

[Espo15]

Not history as such, but like how it was created the acts etc that have changed its powers/jurisdiction.
If you're writing an entire essay on family court you're gonna need a little bit of unnecessary shit

 

[vanillalatte]

oh ok. so you mean the catalysts for why the act was created and reformed etc? yeah i think i only have 1/2 a sentence or 1 sentence on stuff like that. that should do lol. not planning to put more work into it.

 

[aLeeOh!]

yeh... good.. thats what i was thinking.

1 or 2 sentences max i'ld say.