inconsistent behaviour of cathode rays (1 Viewer)

Crisium

Pew Pew
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
2,010
Location
Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
So my question is, why was there any debate as the observations from the paddle wheel experiment seem highly conclusive.
Heinrich Hertz was unable to deflect cathode rays using an electric field suggesting that they did not have charge. Hertz also discovered that cathode rays could pass through thin gold foil without damaging it, meaning that they had no mass, leading him to believe that it was a possible form of electromagnetic radiation. Furthermore, there were objections to the paddle wheel experiment because it was though that the cathode rays heated one side of the paddle, causing the gas in contact with it to heat up and expand, thus causing the paddle to move. This soon became known as the radiometric effect as discovered by J.J Thomson in 1903.

^ The answer to your question (Assuming it wasn't a rhetoric question :p)

This information surprisingly came from In2Physics o_O
 

Fizzy_Cyst

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
1,189
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Uni Grad
2005
^ The answer to your question (Assuming it wasn't a rhetoric question :p)

This information surprisingly came from In2Physics o_O
LeL, That question was the OP's question :)

I find In2Physics has the most relevant content of all HSC textbooks. It's a very well done textbook!

Radiometric Effect is a very real (and complex) effect. The HSC will accept the whole transfer of momentum thing (as they did in the 2005 HSC), but really this experiment does not show that at all.

Check the following articles:

http://australiancurriculumphysics...._VCalisa_Phys_Teach_vol_52_iss_3_142_2014.pdf

http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/documents/2579250
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top