does that mean we dont need to crap on about an historian? or we dont even need quotes?Peartie said:u dont need historiography for this bit
It's source analysis and YOUR own knowledge. So no.pig_93 said:does that mean we dont need to crap on about an historian? or we dont even need quotes?
im lost when it comes to this so called 'historiography'
quotes and statistics arent necessary to achieve full marks in this question.Götterfunken said:Though having a quote, for a few statistics can make a 8 mark answer into a 9-10 mark answer.
No, I didn't say that. My point was if you have an answer that wouldn't get full-marks by itself, having a few quotes or statistics may boost your mark.AlleyCat said:quotes and statistics arent necessary to achieve full marks in this question.
THIS WAS TOO FUNNY! I could not help myself.... SarahJZ, the reason your teacher agrees with 'myusername' s teacher is because they are the same person...that's AmberSarahJZ said:I agree with you 'myusername'...my teacher has been telling us that it could likely be total war/home front, because they haven't done that yet, and its the last year of the syllabus...so I'm hoping he's right...otherwise it might be on the League of Nations or the Treaty of Versailles...