5. Blade Runner / Frankenstein was a bit of a curveball (textual forms?) but still very manageable. The Hamlet question was tough but accommodated plenty of different theses. Conflicting perspectives was straightforward as usual.
I gave it a 6.
The essence of the questions were straightforward, and if you had a broad understanding of your texts, you would be fine. The wording of the questions however, threw me off a lot - it just didn't sound right or logical.
Nonetheless, happy that Hamlet wasn't specified, to the extent it was last year (Althoough I'm not sure if I answered the question right)
Frankenstein/BR was beautiful! I was gleaming when I read it ^_^
But I definitely think that Board of Studies were wrong/unethical in specifying for some and not for others ...