Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Messages
409
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Yes I know all muslims aren't rapist. No, I'm not inferring Islam equals raping females. Yes, this is from a right-wing web page. No, it doesn't dissmiss the stats or provable stats all I had to say is this is damn wrong...............
Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree
By Sharon Lapkin, FrontPageMagazine.com

In Australia, Norway, Sweden and other Western nations, there is a distinct race-based crime in motion being ignored by the diversity police: Islamic men are raping Western women for ethnic reasons. We know this because the rapists have openly declared their sectarian motivations.

When a number of teenage Australian girls were subjected to hours of sexual degradation during a spate of gang rapes in Sydney that occurred between 1998 and 2002, the perpetrators of these assaults framed their rationale in ethnic terms. The young victims were informed that they were “sluts” and “Aussie pigs” while they were being hunted down and abused.

In Australia's New South Wales Supreme Court in December 2005, a visiting Pakistani rapist testified that his victims had no right to say no, because they were not wearing a headscarf.

And earlier this year Australians were outraged when Lebanese Sheik Faiz Mohammed gave a lecture in Sydney where he informed his audience that rape victims had no one to blame but themselves. Women, he said, who wore skimpy clothing, invited men to rape them.

A few months earlier, in Copenhagen, Islamic mufti and scholar, Shahid Mehdi created uproar when – like his peer in Australia – he stated that women who did not wear a headscarf were asking to be raped.

And with haunting synchronicity in 2004, the London Telegraph reported that visiting Egyptian scholar Sheik Yusaf al-Qaradawi claimed female rape victims should be punished if they were dressed immodestly when they were raped. He added, “For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must have shown good conduct.”

In Norway and Sweden, journalist Fjordman warns of a rape epidemic. Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen stated that the steady increase of rape-cases and the link to ethnicity are clear, unmistakable trends. Two out of three persecutions for rape in Oslo are immigrants with a non-Western background and 80 percent of the victims are Norwegian women.

In Sweden, according to translator for Jihad Watch, Ali Dashti, “Gang rapes, usually involving Muslim immigrant males and native Swedish girls, have become commonplace.” A few weeks ago she said, “Five Kurds brutally raped a 13-year-old Swedish girl.”

In France, Samira Bellil broke her silence – after enduring years of repeated gang rapes in one of the Muslim populated public housing projects – and wrote a book, In the hell of the tournantes, that shocked France. Describing how gang rape is rampant in the banlieues, she explained to Time that, “any neighborhood girl who smokes, uses makeup or wears attractive clothes is a whore.”

Unfortunately, Western women are not the only victims in this epidemic. In Indonesia, in 1998, human rights groups documented the testimony of over 100 Chinese women who were gang raped during the riots that preceded the fall of President Suharto. Many of them were told: “You must be raped, because you are Chinese and non-Muslim.”

Christian Solidarity Worldwide reported that in April 2005, a 9-year-old Pakistani girl was raped, beaten with a cricket bat, hanged upside down from the ceiling, had spoonfuls of chillies poured into her mouth, and repeatedly bashed while handcuffed. Her Muslim neighbours told her they were taking revenge for the American bombing of Iraqi children and informed her they were doing it because she was an “infidel and a Christian.”

In Sudan – where Arab Muslims slaughter black Muslim and Christian Sudanese in an ongoing genocide – former Sudanese slave and now a human rights’ activist Simon Deng says he witnessed girls and women being raped and that the Arab regime of Khartoum sends its soldiers to the field to rape and murder. In other reports, women who are captured by government forces are asked; “Are you Christian or Muslim?” and those who answer Christian, are gang raped before having their breasts cut off.<---[young jeezy] Daaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmnnnnnnn

This phenomenon of Islamic sexual violence against women should be treated as the urgent, violent, repressive epidemic it is. Instead, journalists, academics, and politicians ignore it, rationalize it, or ostracize those who dare discuss it.

In Australia, when journalist Paul Sheehan reported honestly on the Sydney gang rapes, he was called a racist and accused of stirring up anti-Muslim hatred. And when he reported in his Sydney Morning Herald column that there was a high incidence of crime amongst Sydney’s Lebanese community, fellow journalist, David Marr sent him an e-mail stating, “That is a disgraceful column that reflects poorly on us all at the Herald.”

Keysar Trad, vice-president of the Australian Lebanese Muslim Association said the gang rapes were a “heinous” crime but complained it was “rather unfair” that the ethnicity of the rapists had been reported.

Journalist Miranda Devine reported during the same rape trials that all reference to ethnicity had been deleted from the victim impact statement because the prosecutors wanted to negotiate a plea bargain.

So when Judge Megan Latham declared, “There is no evidence before me of any racial element in the commission of these offences,” everyone believed her. And the court, the politicians and most of the press may as well have raped the girls again.

Retired Australian detective Tim Priest warned in 2004 that the Lebanese gangs, which emerged in Sydney in the 1990s – when the police were asleep – had morphed out of control. “The Lebanese groups,” he said, “ were ruthless, extremely violent, and they intimidated not only innocent witnesses, but even the police that attempted to arrest them.”

Priest describes how in 2001, in a Muslim dominated area of Sydney two policemen stopped a car containing three well-known Middle Eastern men to search for stolen property. As the police carried out their search they were physically threatened and the three men claimed they were going to track them down, kill them and then rape their girlfriends.

According to Priest, it didn’t end there. As the Sydney police called for backup the three men used their mobile phones to call their associates, and within minutes, 20 Middle Eastern men arrived on the scene. They punched and pushed the police and damaged state vehicles. The police retreated and the gang followed them to the police station where they intimidated staff, damaged property and held the police station hostage.

Eventually the gang left, the police licked their wounds, and not one of them took action against the Middle Eastern men. Priest claims, “In the minds of the local population, the police are cowards and the message was, 'Lebanese [Muslim gangs] rule the streets.'”

In France, in the banlieues, where gang rape is now known simply as tournantes or ‘pass-around,’ victims know the police will not protect them. If they complain, Samir Bellil said, they know that they and their families will be threatened.

However, Muslim women in the French ghettos are finally fighting back against gang rape and police non-action. They have begun a movement called, “We’re neither whores nor doormats.” They are struggling against the intrinsic violence that plagues their neighbourhoods and the culture that condones it.

In most French prosecutions, the Muslim rapists state that they do not believe they have committed a crime. And in a frightening parallel with the gang rapists in Australia, they claim the victim herself is to blame and accuse her of being a “slut” or a “whore.”

According to The Guardian, during the recent French riots, a Saudi Prince with shares in News Corporation boasted to a conference in had Dubai that he phoned Rupert Murdoch and complained about Fox News describing the disturbances as “Muslim riots.” Within half an hour he said, it was changed to “civil riots.”

Swedish translator, Ali Dashti, stated that in Sweden when three men raped a 22-year-old woman recently, they said one word to her. “Whore.” Such stories, according to Dashti, are in the Swedish newspapers every week. And, the politically correct “take great care not to mention the ethnic background of the perpetrators.”

Sweden’s English newspaper The Local reported in July that Malmo police commander Bengt Lindström had been charged with inciting racial hatred. He sent e-mails from his home computer to two city officials. To the head of healthcare, he wrote: “You...treat old Swedes who have worked hard building up the fatherland like parasites and would rather give my taxes to criminals called Mohammed from Rosengärd.”

In Malmo, the third largest city in Sweden, the police have admitted, Dashti says, that they no longer control the city. “It is effectively ruled by violent gangs of Muslim immigrants.” Ambulance personnel are regularly attacked and spat upon and are now refusing to help until a police escort arrives. The police are too afraid to enter parts of the city without backup.

In early 2005, Norwegian newspapers reported that Oslo had recorded the highest ever number of rape cases in the previous twelve months. However, Fjordman explained, the official statistics contained no data regarding “how immigrants were grossly over represented in rape cases”, and the media remain so strangely silent.

Oslo Professor of Anthropology, Unni Wikan, said Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men believe women are responsible for rape, she stated, the women must adapt to the multicultural society around them.

The BBC pulled a documentary scheduled for screening in 2004, after police in Britain warned it could increase racial tension. “In these exceptional circumstances... Channel 4 as a responsible broadcaster has agreed to the police’s request...” The documentary was to show how Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abused young, white English girls as young as 11.

The number of rapes committed by Muslim men against women in the last decade is so incredibly high that it cannot be viewed as anything other than culturally implicit behaviour. It is overtly reinforced and sanctioned by Islamic religious leaders who blame the victims and excuse the rapists.

In three decades of immigration into Western countries, Islam has caused social upheaval and havoc in every one of its host countries. No other immigration program has encountered the problems of non-assimilation and religious ambiguity.

Everywhere in the world, Muslims are in conflict with their neighbours. And as Mark Steyn recently said, every conflict appears to have originated by someone with the name of Mohammed.

In July 2005, Melbourne Sheik Mohammad Omran told Sixty Minutes that “...we believe we have more rights than you because we choose Australia to be our home and you didn’t. “

In the same interview visiting Sheik Khalid Yasin warned “There’s no such thing as a Muslim having a non-Muslim friend, so a non-Muslim could be your associate but they can't be a friend. They're not your friend because they don't understand your religious principles and they cannot because they don't understand your faith.”

Despite being told over and over by Islamic scholars, and witnessing massive influxes of Islamic crime, Western countries continue to believe in the reality of assimilation and moral relativism.

In Australia, Lebanese Christians have assimilated and become a respected part of our community. The Premier of Victoria is a Lebanese Christian as is the Governor Of New South Wales. However, Lebanese Muslims have encountered serious problems because of their refusal to accept our right to live our way of life. Nothing so clearly demonstrates that it is not an issue of race — but of culture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

hiphophooray123

Twisted firestarter
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
4,982
Location
Sydney University Village
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
the one thing i will never understand is what goes on in a muslim-extremist's mind.

seriously they should be treated as if they were sub-human for them to think this way, stripped of human rights.

as the great philosopher ntb said on 2gb, [insert some shit about sacrifices for the greater good]

and yes if you want to say im generalising then OK then go ahead and hide behind the word like a little hippie fuck you and allah
 

veterandoggy

A Restless Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
1,242
Location
Somewhere yonder where the sun never rises
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
hiphophooray123 said:
the one thing i will never understand is what goes on in a muslim-extremist's mind.

and yes if you want to say im generalising then OK then go ahead and hide behind the word like a little hippie fuck you and allah
i want to know what they think about too.

you are being specific to what group? if it is muslims, then yes that is a generalisation no matter what the circumstance, but if it is specific (and lebs arent specific btw, it is still a generalisation) then it cant be a generalisation. plus that was an unnecessary insult, and i think you knew that before you posted it.
 

sly fly

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
581
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Yes, it would be interesting if somebody conducted a study about what goes on in the mind of a Muslim extremist.....that is, if they found one before they killed themselves. Other than messed up interpretations, I think what also influences their thinking is their socio-cultural background and life circumstances. Anyway, please abstain from insults.
 
Last edited:

veterandoggy

A Restless Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
1,242
Location
Somewhere yonder where the sun never rises
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
In the same interview visiting Sheik Khalid Yasin warned “There’s no such thing as a Muslim having a non-Muslim friend, so a non-Muslim could be your associate but they can't be a friend. They're not your friend because they don't understand your religious principles and they cannot because they don't understand your faith.”
it is amazing how the good stuff are never interesting to the media, only the ones which would spark the most debate. i have only went to one of his lectures (the death lecture) and he was one of the best speakers about islam that i have heard of. as for sheik feiz muhammad, he is made like some big time scholar, when i really never heard about him, and would have never heard about him, had he not been the guest speaker at that lecture. he isnt the best english speaker, and many understood what he meant, but the media wanted to use the literal terms to create unnecessary commotion.
 

veterandoggy

A Restless Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
1,242
Location
Somewhere yonder where the sun never rises
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
TerrbleSpellor said:
the fact that he said these words, whether they have been taken out of context or not, is enough.

Besides, it's not necessarily what people say, but how they think. Everyone knows how Muslims really think.
yeah. or at least i know what the NCAP muslims are thinking: "kill TS!!!"

whoops! my big bad mouth. i guess this is going to make its own thread in NCAP...
 

Captain Gh3y

Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
4,153
Location
falling from grace with god
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
He can't speak very good Engish huh?

Maybe the government should help pay for some English lesson for these Muslim speakers instead of handing out multicultural grants to encourage the crap they preach about.
 

veterandoggy

A Restless Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
1,242
Location
Somewhere yonder where the sun never rises
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
had he said it in arabic, and it had meant that literally, i would have shut my mouth. but the fact is that he is a fluent arabic speaker, not a fluent english speaker, so there will be many complicated words in arabic, which were he to tryt to translate them on the spot, would differ from their meaning.
 

sly fly

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
581
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Regarding Khalid Yassin, I've been to a few of his lectures and I don't like him at all. He is very illogical and does not represent me as a Muslim. Terrblespellor, I think you fail to realise that there is no one set way as to how Muslim's think. Muslims are a diverse group of people who think in different ways.
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
veterandoggy said:
it is amazing how the good stuff are never interesting to the media, only the ones which would spark the most debate. i have only went to one of his lectures (the death lecture) and he was one of the best speakers about islam that i have heard of. as for sheik feiz muhammad, he is made like some big time scholar, when i really never heard about him, and would have never heard about him, had he not been the guest speaker at that lecture. he isnt the best english speaker, and many understood what he meant, but the media wanted to use the literal terms to create unnecessary commotion.
I understand what he was saying, but I think that such beliefs come from a difference in social and cultural makeup. In Australian society - as with the western world - that is not the way we seek to interact with each other. Simply because people have different religious beliefs or religious principles is no bar to them being a close friend. In western societies, where liberalism has flourished, the promotion of individual freedoms means that diversity in deeply held spiritual beliefs does not impinge upon the capacity for strong relationships.

I have always been very critical of religion. I am an agnostic (and an atheist when it comes to the Christian god). But several of my best friends have been religious. Indeed, I am chasing a staunchly religious girl right now. But in this country and many others, individual freedoms are extremely important, and people are acceping of different belief systems without inhibiting personal relationships.

I am not sure of the particular beliefs of Islam on the issue, but with regard to what the sheik said, any religion that would prevent strong friendships between people simply because of different spiritual beliefs is (1) highly arrogant, and (2) an unreasonable restriction on the cohesion of society, the harmony of the human race and the progress of civilisation.
 

veterandoggy

A Restless Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
1,242
Location
Somewhere yonder where the sun never rises
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
TerrbleSpellor said:
Why does he need to learn english? He spends his whole time living in communities that are saturated with arabic, and he probably finds that mixing with other non-arabic people, causes conflict with his religion.. Which is how pretty much all muslims feel, and which explains why they live in their own sub-nations like Lakemba and Auburn.
TS, what nationality is the govenor general? and where is she living?
 

sly fly

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
581
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Captain Gh3y said:
Then why do all the preachers that claim to represent them all say much the same things?

Where are all the muslims who don't think this way?
They don't. The only preachers you are aware of are probably the ones you've seen on the media who say such things. Ofcourse, the preachers who preach good things won't make it on the media because theres no reason for it. When Muslim clerics sit there and preach ''we should be kind to people, we should respect our parents, we should practice forgiveness'' etc etc etc, there isn't any reason for them to attract publicity because this is what most people preach and it's nothing out of the ordinary. The sheikh at my local mosque has never preached anything like raping is ok or whatever, he has continuously condemned such things. He preaches goodness and tolerance and all that kind of stuff.

I am a Muslim who doesn't think in that way and if you like, I can introduce you to over a hundred other Muslims who don't think this way - and that's just from sydney.
 

veterandoggy

A Restless Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
1,242
Location
Somewhere yonder where the sun never rises
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
MoonlightSonata said:
I understand what he was saying

I am an agnostic (and an atheist when it comes to the Christian god).

I am not sure of the particular beliefs of Islam on the issue, but with regard to what the sheik said, any religion that would prevent strong friendships between people simply because of different spiritual beliefs is (1) highly arrogant, and (2) an unreasonable restriction on the cohesion of society, the harmony of the human race and the progress of civilisation.
at least there are some people here that try to think for themselves.

lol i wonder what gave you that stance :rolleyes:

there is a verse in the quran which i think is where he got that from, and it is along of the lines of they will not be your friends until you follow them ie. their religion. if you were to give this thought you can see some truth in it. you cant pull a guy off the street and analyse him though, nor many people from any religion, becasue no one is following their religion like they should, but the prophet made treaties with non muslims, and he even visited his jewish neighbour when the old man didnt throw his faecal matter in front of the prophet's house one day, because he thought something happened to the old man (i think the old man was sick, im not sure). i think the friendship in this regard isnt the friendship that you have with your school friends, it could be referring to deeper friendship, but im no scholar, just a tired school student :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top