I did Question 8 in Frames - about contemporary art challenging traditional art. It was a toss up between that and Question 7. I didn't think it was too bad, just required a slight manipulation of my essay plan....
hi yea i started with the back page
then thought no i can't do it
then i thought to do question 7 but it asked for both sides and i only had one side!!!!!!!!!! so i had to go to 4
by that time i only had 35 mins to write so TOTALLY stuffed it up!!!!!
I did question 7. But I didn't read the question probably and with about 25min to go I relised it said give bother views, so I cant to quickly make up a second half to my essay, I stuffed up! But I think I managed to recove from my mistake ok.
I found it pretty good.
I found section I good, only because i had a few good ideas from
an article i read before-hand about critics and how they can elevate artists. it helped with part 3.
The essays were shocking. i did question 9 about visual language, but i dunno if i did it right. i seriously must have looked at the question every 30 seconds because i kept forgeting it :/
Its one of those questions where u can go off on a tangent, and i think i did that a few times.
i did ques 9, arguing that art is the visual language, so i could use all my cultural stuff, titian, manet, roberts, duchamp and holzer... jst tlked bout the ideas and interests of a world influencing an artists' way of thinking and thus, their practice.
i did 9 as well, talked about holtzer, varvaressos, sherman, kruger, Stelarc, parr, orlan, duchamp, warhol, kozic, bennet, moffart, whiteley, orr and...beyurs. i didnt really relate it directly to the frames but im hoping the markers get my general gist...