stupid_girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2009
- Messages
- 221
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Hopefully I can introduce you another approach which is pure substitution and differential integration that I’m developing. However i need to prepare for trials atm!
Use the fact that forI’m quite stuck with this question, been doing for week. Pretty appreciate your help
I see I’ll check. Cuz i later figured out it’s Rolle theorem. Thank you, I’ll check them outUse the fact that forwith equality holding for all x iff f(x) = 0.
I see, yeah i just realized. Thank you, I’ll fix itNote thatso some of your working is incorrect.
Looking forward to your approach.Hopefully I can introduce you another approach which is pure substitution and differential integration that I’m developing. However i need to prepare for trials atm!
i like how this is just a reskin of the BOS Trials' cancerous arctangent integral
To get this thread going again I thought I'd give one of these a go.
what was your thought process behind that u-sub?To get this thread going again I thought I'd give one of these a go.
Letting:
We can eliminate any odd function terms in the expansion of the numerator (note that the denominator is even) as we are integrating over, so they go to 0. We end up with:
Both integrals are pretty straight forward to evaluate now, yielding a final answer of.