i know it would usually be better to prove from lhs to rhs or vice verse but sometimes it is just so much simpler to work on both simultaneously. is it that bad to meet in the middle?
i know it would usually be better to prove from lhs to rhs or vice verse but sometimes it is just so much simpler to work on both simultaneously. is it that bad to meet in the middle?
i know it would usually be better to prove from lhs to rhs or vice verse but sometimes it is just so much simpler to work on both simultaneously. is it that bad to meet in the middle?
its not a bad thing to do some sketch work and work from the middle there as it can get u ahead sometimes. but when writing the final proof i would write from lhs to rhs or vice versa