Gravitation Potential energy. (1 Viewer)

kwabon

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
646
Location
right behind you, mate
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
What happens to the potential energy during the first stage of the rocket?
will it increase or decrease? and reasons for your answer as well.

what i am thinking is due to Potential energy = mgh, shouldnt it increase?
but if you were to take potential energy = Gm(1)m(2)/r, it will decrease.

ahhh so confused atm:confused:

thanks for all your help.
 

boxhunter91

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
736
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Remember the equation is negative.
From a point such as 6378000m to a point 26378000m the distance will increase therefore GPE will decrease.
Hope that helps.
 

kwabon

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
646
Location
right behind you, mate
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Remember the equation is negative.
From a point such as 6378000m to a point 26378000m the distance will increase therefore GPE will decrease.
Hope that helps.
thanks for your help, but i said the first stage, that will most likely be in the earth's atmosphere itself, just about 50km above the earth's surface.
 

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
What happens to the potential energy during the first stage of the rocket?
will it increase or decrease? and reasons for your answer as well.

what i am thinking is due to Potential energy = mgh, shouldnt it increase?
but if you were to take potential energy = Gm(1)m(2)/r, it will decrease.

ahhh so confused atm

thanks for all your help.
That's not the right way to use that equation.
The potential equation that you are familiar with Ep=-GmM/r in my opinion is a terrible way of describing the purpose of that equation.
To fix it, its simple,

Let gravitational potential energy of an object be


Chances are you haven't looked at it this way right? The gravitational potential equation is indeed a function of position. ie its a function whose input is the position of the object, and once you substituted a position into that function it will spit out the gravitational potential energy of the object at that certain location that you inputted (relative to the axis you have chosen to use).

So to find the change in change in gravitational potential energy, its really the gravitational potential energy at the final position minus the gravitational potential energy at the initial position.

let and denote initial position and final position

so the change in gravitational potential energy is..





but in a rocket launch Xf>Xi

so

ie gravitational Potential energy of the rocket is increasing as it gain altitude
 
Last edited:

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
and take the derivative of that function with respect to x and you will notice something cool (this is how we define potential energy)
 
Last edited:

shady145

Banned
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
1,687
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
^^ didnt know that GMm/x^2
thats also helps with a question my teacher couldnt get thnx
 

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
np! and also if you are interested, try integrating the other fundamental forces to get their respective potential functions. This will help you in understanding stopping voltage
 
Last edited:

shady145

Banned
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
1,687
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
np! and also if you are interested, try integrating the other fundamental forces to get their respective potential functions. This will help you in understanding stopping voltage
ooo ill do it now ^^ . i dnt know what stopping voltage is?
 

shady145

Banned
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
1,687
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
np! and also if you are interested, try integrating the other fundamental forces to get their respective potential functions. This will help you in understanding stopping voltage
ooo ill do it now... i dnt know what stopping voltage is XD
 

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
ooo ill do it now... i dnt know what stopping voltage is XD
Stopping voltage refers to the voltage between the cathode and the anode that is set up by the electric field that is used to decelerates photoelectrons release from the cathode due to photoelectric effect. So basically to calculate what the stopping voltage is, is asking how strong of an E field do i need to shove in between the electrodes to reduce the kinetic energy of the electrons down to zero. And this requires a change in potential energy of the system (conservation of energy)
 
Last edited:

kwabon

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
646
Location
right behind you, mate
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
That's not the right way to use that equation.
The potential equation that you are familiar with Ep=-GmM/r in my opinion is a terrible way of describing the purpose of that equation.
To fix it, its simple,

Let gravitational potential energy of an object be


Chances are you haven't looked at it this way right? The gravitational potential equation is indeed a function of position. ie its a function whose input is the position of the object, and once you substituted a position into that function it will spit out the gravitational potential energy of the object at that certain location that you inputted (relative to the axis you have chosen to use).

So to find the change in change in gravitational potential energy, its really the gravitational potential energy at the final position minus the gravitational potential energy at the initial position.

let and denote initial position and final position

so the change in gravitational potential energy is..





but in a rocket launch Xf>Xi

so

ie gravitational Potential energy of the rocket is increasing as it gain altitude
totally agree with you, said that potential energy will increase, and apparently i got it wrong.
potential energy decreases, is the answer!! :confused:

post up the actual question tomorrow, feeling sleepy now.
 

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
oh wait i forgot.. dont try to do it for magnetic force, since the particle's trajectory is not one dimensional under that force, you would have to integrate its torque with respect to its angular position rather than force with respect to position... i think.. feels rusty = =
 
Last edited:

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
totally agree with you, said that potential energy will increase, and apparently i got it wrong.
potential energy decreases, is the answer!! :confused:

post up the actual question tomorrow, feeling sleepy now.
Wait i initially misread the question (i thought it was asking how the gravitational potential was changing, i blame title of this thread). It is true that the gravitational potential is increasing, BUT the system's overall potential is decreasing.(there are potential changes due to other forces) Assuming the total kinetic energy of the system is increasing. So the q was testing on your knowledge of conservation of energy, rather than how to calculate gravitational potential changes.
 
Last edited:

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
i just realised that the HSC syllabus has lead some of you to believe that potential energy is something that is only associated with gravity (is this true?) In fact that is not true. Potential energy is something associated with a force in general. There are many different kinds of forces, so there are many more ways that a change in potential energy can occur, rather than just when gravity is acting.
 
Last edited:

helper

Active Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
1,183
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
totally agree with you, said that potential energy will increase, and apparently i got it wrong.
potential energy decreases, is the answer!! :confused:

post up the actual question tomorrow, feeling sleepy now.
Was this the Catholic Paper. I haven't seen it but have heard that there was an incorrect answer, similar to what you stated. Most schools picked it up and fixed it.
 

kwabon

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
646
Location
right behind you, mate
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Was this the Catholic Paper. I haven't seen it but have heard that there was an incorrect answer, similar to what you stated. Most schools picked it up and fixed it.
yeh, it was the catholic school trials, so we can agree on the fact that gravitational potential energy is decreasing?
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
yeh, it was the catholic school trials, so we can agree on the fact that gravitational potential energy is decreasing?
No, it's increasing.The gravitational potential energy of an object at some point within a gravitational field is equivalent to the word done in moving the object from infinity to that point. It is given by the formula
.

When an object moves from infinity to any point it moves with the gravitational field and gains Ke, losing Ep. Hence the Ep of any object in space is negative in value compared to Ep = 0 at infinity.
This can be mathematically shown by:
Ep at infinity > Ep at any point within a gravitational field
But Ep at infinity = 0
0 > Ep at any point within a gravitational field
Ep at any point within a gravitational field < 0
Now even from just looking at the formula, as the rocket gains alititude it's mass will decrease (as the fuel is being used) and the radius increases. Therefore, as time passes and the rocket gains alititude the GPE becomes a less negative number ie it is increasing, approaching the limit of 0.

You can say the GPE is decreasing ONLY if you specify that it's the magnitude that is decreasing, but even then you should say that it's negative and that the maximum possible value is 0 :)
 

Uncle

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
3,265
Location
Retirement Village of Alaska
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
That's not the right way to use that equation.
The potential equation that you are familiar with Ep=-GmM/r in my opinion is a terrible way of describing the purpose of that equation.
To fix it, its simple,

Let gravitational potential energy of an object be


Chances are you haven't looked at it this way right? The gravitational potential equation is indeed a function of position. ie its a function whose input is the position of the object, and once you substituted a position into that function it will spit out the gravitational potential energy of the object at that certain location that you inputted (relative to the axis you have chosen to use).

So to find the change in change in gravitational potential energy, its really the gravitational potential energy at the final position minus the gravitational potential energy at the initial position.

let and denote initial position and final position

so the change in gravitational potential energy is..





but in a rocket launch Xf>Xi

so

ie gravitational Potential energy of the rocket is increasing as it gain altitude
hahahah i like how this guy keeps using tertiary physics to explain hsc physics.
cant wait till you explain electromagnetism in motors and generators where it has all these calculus and vector terms lol.

^^ didnt know that GMm/x^2
thats also helps with a question my teacher couldnt get thnx
that's for one dimension, hence x was chosen as a coordinate.
we could have said GMm/(x2 + y2 + z2)
 

kwabon

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
646
Location
right behind you, mate
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
No, it's increasing.The gravitational potential energy of an object at some point within a gravitational field is equivalent to the word done in moving the object from infinity to that point. It is given by the formula
.

When an object moves from infinity to any point it moves with the gravitational field and gains Ke, losing Ep. Hence the Ep of any object in space is negative in value compared to Ep = 0 at infinity.
This can be mathematically shown by:
Ep at infinity > Ep at any point within a gravitational field
But Ep at infinity = 0
0 > Ep at any point within a gravitational field
Ep at any point within a gravitational field < 0
Now even from just looking at the formula, as the rocket gains alititude it's mass will decrease (as the fuel is being used) and the radius increases. Therefore, as time passes and the rocket gains alititude the GPE becomes a less negative number ie it is increasing, approaching the limit of 0.

You can say the GPE is decreasing ONLY if you specify that it's the magnitude that is decreasing, but even then you should say that it's negative and that the maximum possible value is 0 :)
but the answers of the CSSA physics for this particular question is increasing.
God dammit, i thought i knew Gpe, now due to the answers in the CSSA it is confusing the shit out of me.
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
but the answers of the CSSA physics for this particular question is increasing.
God dammit, i thought i knew Gpe, now due to the answers in the CSSA it is confusing the shit out of me.
It is increasing as i said. As it's becoming a less negative number, it's increasing.

For example if it's 500m above the ground the GPE could be say -500 but when it's 1000m off the ground it might be -300. See how it's increasing (becoming less negative) as -300 > -500?

**Just fake values are used XD
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top