Drsoccerball
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 3,650
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon
New Question
New Question
Whats wrong with my working out though ?
Because in my question, k must be an integer, because the sub-scripted k means you must nest the logarithm "k" times. What does it mean to iterate a function 1.5 times? Nonsense, that's what. (This comment assumes you do not know what a functional square root is)Whats wrong with my working out though ?
New Question
Typical question.Because in my question, k must be an integer, because the sub-scripted k means you must nest the logarithm "k" times. What does it mean to iterate a function 1.5 times? Nonsense, that's what. (This comment assumes you do not know what a functional square root is)
Dw if there's a long one I can do Ill get him back.Typical question.
First find the integral of the arcsine using, IBP. Then do the resulting integral, using, IBP.
Also, nice revenging on Drsoccerball LOL...
Whats wrong with my working out though ?
how can you assume that xlnx → 0 as x→ 0? You need to properly justify this using mx2 tools
(#)
#
My bad I was so obsessed with the Paradoxica thing I forgot about that. Use rectangles.how can you assume that xlnx → 0 as x→ 0? You need to properly justify this using mx2 tools
how can you assume that xlnx → 0 as x→ 0? You need to properly justify this using mx2 tools
I have not seen this as a course assumption.
how can you assume that xlnx → 0 as x→ 0? You need to properly justify this using mx2 tools
This is just a standard log solution. We can simplify the sum of k's using an A.P. sum formula. Did you possibly mean product instead of sum on the denominator (makes it more interesting)?
A clever 2016er can do this.