Recent content by anagram-

this man is a legend. would someone buy him a drink? winnnnnnnnnnerrrr

hi ajeet how's it going

OKAY. it's me again. before some of you all start complaining like the little pricks you are: Dear Ritam In considering students’ responses, markers award marks for demonstration of achievement in relation to the requirements of the question. While marks will not be deducted for responses...

oh okay my mistake, it's just what it said on the news here : HSC exam cheats call on hi-tech help | National News | News.com.au and why did you delete my last post lol

are you trying to impress me? i do physics as well. and don't try and backtrack now. you were specifically talking about mathematics. perms and combs is not a topic found in physics unless you can impress me with a relevant comparison again? p.s. to the guy from bishop druitt college ... where...

you're fucking delusional. maths is not at all about "expressing" ideas. are you fucking serious? how could new FORMULAS be developed? are you aware that most of these "formulas" used in maths today are several hundred years old and there was no "square" to begin with, for people to start...

it's not a fucking metaphor at all why are you even here? clearly you're not going to do well in english anyway

and if you did any maths, you'd know that it's those sorts of questions which are open to debate in class. people will come up with another answer and the teacher will say "hey that's right too, the textbook's wrong" and everyone moves on and everyone's happy. so if you're going to compare it...

omg. drop it. fluorescent, he's said a dozen times it's all about interpretation. the question didn't say "use [insert any other word you like here] ONE related text". yeah i agree with you. YOU INSERTED A FUCKING ONLY. stop crying! if it's ignored it's ignored. big deal. if you're good at...

+1 exactly. they definitely shouldn't get marked up, and they definitely shouldn't be penalised. that's all.

nah, i meant in the same way they say AT LEAST one, they should say ONLY one i did NOT mean saying ONLY one = saying AT LEAST one. context plz

it doesn't tell you anything to do with writing more than one related text. agreed. but it doesn't say anything about NOT doing more than one related text either. it's open to interpretation, and all of you are saying "reading the question" is part of the english. so is interpretation. anyway...

it's CLEARLY not that fucking obvious when half the state has done one thing and half the state did the other. all of the hardline "one related text" people will obviously argue your case but then the people who wrote two will argue theirs. i.e. ambiguous

i'm saying what mas said - writing two relateds automatically means you wrote one. which in turn means they can't fucking punish you if you wrote 2. i'm all for the other one being ignored, whatever. but you can't punish someone who DID answer the question, albeit in a different way if they'd...

saying ONLY one just like they say AT LEAST one. that seems like a pretty easy way to make the question less ambiguous, idiot but since you clearly didn't read my entire post, i don't expect you to understand what i'm saying after this effort either. idiot.