ohh i stopped using this site when i went on holidays xDD we didnt get our results back but, I think i went ok, my friend helped me out with this way to deal with them OMCARPU or something, Origin, Motive, Context, Reliability Perspective, Usefulness ;P, for the Usefulness to Historian, then for...
There is a kid in my Geography class who is a "bogan" and talks with great stupidity, he started studying heaps and he's been getting 80-90%s and I wonder if he could actually get a decent mark in the HSC despite his nature... I wondered what u guys would think?
I made a really long passage of all the things that I thought about Anna's response and this topic, I realised that my opinion just like all of yours would be too byist, because intelligence is a personal thing that can't be measured.
A wise sensei once told me
"You only need to be smart...
I believe in trying to measure aspects like these in an equation to good results
would be something like, every person starts off with a mark, that they would get if they didn't work at all, lets say 80 for a smart student and 70 for an average, 60 for a stupid student.. then from here depending...
Wild eh? xd,and yes im doing WW1 core atm, due to my teachers failness I have been making my own notes which aren't that comprehensive yet ;p.. but ty alot!! making me feel guilty for not studying right now cause i got test on Friday -__-----