Recent content by markus123456789

Come on , If it was a scientist testing the AAS it would have to be C, because they would use more accurate values right? Meh .. its a gay trick question otherwise :P GRR.. but this dischordant result was definatly taken out...

Hey, i think the results are irrelevant for this experiements, because in the exam they will likely give you a sample and ask you to find the contend in that.. but anywho.. heres the calculations you can use :) Ammonium sulfate if the main constitunet in most lawn fertilisers. Ba + SO4 --->...

Yeh thats what i got, but it was a bit of a controversial Q i dunno.. it wasnt very specific about if she chose them and them put them back .. or what not.. ^o).. ohwell... i guessed right :D

God Dammit Xd

I'm not sure if this is too late. But also for a horizontal pt of inflection, the sign of the derivative needs to be tested on either side of the turning pt to determine if its +, 0, + or - ,0, -. because when both f'(x) and f''(x) = 0 it doesnt mean that it has to be a horizontal pt of...

Im pretty sure that there was a simpler way to do it. From what i remember i let Fw=mg = F/l= KI1I2/D From there the equation could be rearranged to give D as the subject. D = KI1I2L / mg I cant remember exactly how it went but from there looking at the table that was given ,take a...

Yeh thats what i got also... at first i looked at it and was thinking... how could it be so much less energy, but the i realized that as the radius increased, the amount of energy was reduced significantly :) I hope thats right cause thats what i got. I did it a bit differently though where i...

Yeh i got .3 meters aswell. Ahh i got out of the exam and all the really smart people were like it had to be shorter.. and i was like hmm.. nah from frame of reference, but they didnt believe me.. whoop i got it right :P Or so i hope ^^