Apparently the law school has been quite underfunded which has resulted in less teaching hours and less staff. I've also heard that the underfunding was caused by MQ's academic restructure which placed the law school under the faculty of arts instead of its own independent faculty. As a result...
Is it me... or is any other MQ law student getting tired of the inadequacy of their teaching?? I mean 1 hr tutes and not enough staff and only enough time to go through one or two questions isn't exactly my idea of 'quality' education....
Well i'm planning to do a Law/arts combined degree, but i can't seem to decide whether Macquarie or UTS is he better uni. I know UTS has a strong communications degree, but i hold law much higher. I would much like to go to USYD though unfortunately my ATAR does not reach 99.55 (or watever it...
Why can't we just let people be whatever they want to be without making various bullshit theories of why people are gay or straight. People must learn to accept others and placing religion and science on the forefront of the argument merely exacerbates the issue.
I dont think that its correct...
i have a task which i have to show how conflicting perspectives are shown in the Justice Game and a related text (i chose frost/nixon)
firstly however, how would one define conflicting perspectives??