I thought it was ok, although I would have preferred it if there had been a bit more on the issues regarding science's inability to keep up with me.
How'd you go?
PS. I didn't actually find this from your profile. Yay
You're right in that it is a syllabus point, but the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation isn't a religious body is it?
Also, secularism does have an impact on interfaith dialogue.
I don't think it was a very simple question that invoked a pure recount of events.
It was asking you to make a judgement 'to what extent'. Hence factors that DIDN'T fulfill their aims should be considered ie stuff that happened during the transformation. The question had quite a huge scope of...
Maybe because it WASN'T about all the topics. It had nothing to do with the significant person. It was based on Ethics and/OR Significant Practices, hence the vague question was so people would make their own interpretations which many people are seemingly incapable of.
The Section III questions had NOTHING to do with personalities. They were based on ethics and SOME of the significant practices, but not all of them. For example, in Islam, the Qur'an doesn't actually provide guidance regarding the funeral ceremony hence that significant practice couldn't really...
The Islam question was clearly about ethics. The quote was specifically about guidance, and the question about its role in the life of adherents. Since any of the practices are single events, they clearly aren't something that could be considered a part of the 'life of Muslims', whereas ethics...