Recent content by zabzoub1

:monkey: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: all niter woo hoo... suck my balls bord of studies, last time i even think about u :D:D:D:D :jaw: :shoot: :argue: :skip: :mad: :ninja:

DEAR BOARD OF STUDIES: WHAT THE FUCK DID WE DO TO DESERVE THAT PAPER?? WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO PROOOOVE? THAT WE ARE SHIT? GO FUCK URSELVES.. each question seemed easy enough.... but when u actually do it, FUCKING GETS complicated! WHY not give us normal direct questions instead of...

how easy was that 2unit test! Agree or disagree? p.s. disagree means ur really crap!

THE EASIEST 2unit TEST EVER!!!!!! LOL

dope, with neat consistant writting in standrd eng: A - 7 - 2 related - B- 5 1/2 - 2 poems - C - 7 - 2 related -

Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? WHAT FAGGOT THOUGHT ITS A DOG... HOW CAN A FUCKING DOG GO ON AN AIROPLANE, AND THEN AT THE END OF ALL IT BE RELIEF AS THE DOG WAS ENTERING THE CABIN OF THE AEROPLANE AND THE STEUARTISS SERVES THE FUCKING DOG... FFS it was the easiest poem EVER! stupid idiot...

yehh i agree with deeper analysis hence minimum texts, that is what i am aiming for... but i have all my essays with 1 related text in super detail... and i always got top marks, i just dont want to see hsc 2008 say "at least TWO related texts" because to me its more writting, and less deeper...

i agree, i got a f'ing relief as my damm full time eng year 12 teacher... tlking abut "all my own work" ....f'ing hell

i ment should we expect hsc questions to now say ...and at least TWO related texts??? because most previous years always said *at least ONE* any way i am preping for two, but 2 doesnt always mean better marks, its all about the depth of your analysis, quotes and techniques.... wrote...

hello everyone, now that the stimulus booklet is not going to be used this year, does anyone know what exactly will it be replaced by? Should we now prepare for questions that have TWO related texts, rather than previous years that say ONE? Or will it all be the same, just without a...