Search results

med phy option was shit ass. there were 4 pages worth of it.

...hope it will be like 80. or 81

rather sit back and relax, i think the physics exam now is more toward application with formulas rather memorisation

can some one provide me picture of cathode rays at different gas pressures in the tube please, or just a black and white labeled pic is also much appreciated.

pretty sure thats how u do it. even though it give a result of 0, it is still a result.

there were two accepted theories. 1: the instrument is not sensitive enough. 2: the atmosphere of earth drags the aether along with it as it moves through aether. Still even now that we know that light do no need a medium to propogate, we sitll cannot prove that aether dun exist or exist...

i am not really getting ur attempt thing. but they did set up the experiment, but recorded 0. the experiment, the experiment is valid to the hypothesis. they repeated it and still "null result", so its reliable. So this just proved that there is no relative motion between earth and aether...

i just say its valid, and with its many repetition it is also reliable. use of interferometer give accuracy. the rest would be description. and justify the individual steps.

endoscope? i haven;t done any exp for med phy, teacher sux. the only scan i saw in class was she showing use an x-ray of some pelvis... can some one tell me the endoscope exp, and what u do when u look at the scans? do u describe it or what?

but webbers aready connotate the per meter squared part.

oh thankyou so much. the successone give such irrelevant stuff at the end of the answer like "exegeration..."

nono, thats so not what i am saying. ie: for an electron to decelerate a quick speeds it needs to hit the tungsten target. But hitting the tungsten atoms will cause a inner electron to be knocked out and the energy released when an outer electrons falls back to the inner shell create x-ray...

its pretty simple, mainly comprehension types, so need minimum brain power, but large harddisk is required. So its a nice contrast to the trend on core physics with the trend of now applying knowledge. so it rest the brain. but hate the spin part, it was never tested so maybe this yr is will...

lol, i do med phy. so its ok i never heard of it

for that question the answer says that its not possible to jump 7.66 meters, and at a velocity of 12m/s directly up. But doesn't he just like a projectile not vertical, and a take off velocity of 12m/s is possible in that same paper there are two statements we need to discuss and they were...

are there any experiments we need to do in med phy?

einstein for sure

i never heard of this, is this part of the syllabus?

but i am pretty sure that the speed could be altered through mediums... and for the hammer question. it does not have a horizontal velocity. For an object to have centripetal force, it must have a force to the center of motion (earth) and a equal force forward horizontally (the velocity)

wth, the BOS in the exam timetable said that u weren;t allowed to have drinks in the exam room or food unless special needs... now than i know u guys get juice and food, my examiner is tight. so do u bring ur own juice or they give u? do they question u?