Search results

60s

they send in marks to 2 decimal places, there can't be any equal placings

still a virgin, and tearing me up :(

haha dude you think wayy too much. You'll be fine :)

i think i got 2 for the amplitude and 2pi/root3 for the period

a fkn good test.

its funny how everyone found this test so easy, cos it was definitely one of the trickiest short answers since 2001. Howd everyone manage with the multiplier q/question about deregulation/ question about economic growth + domestic and global influences/net income q??? and on top of that the...

im sorry but its not physically possible to write 17 words a line, dont care how small you write there's not enough space.

15,15,15,11,14,14,13,4

i got b=2 not b=0. But a cppl of other ppl said b=0. Can u explain it?

Re: What did you think? yeh thats what i did and yeh it was lotsa work haha, probably not the right method

Re: What did you think? yeh my ratio was 1:1:9, i had some ninths in there somewhere..

Re: What did you think? what were the ratios for the probability q?

Re: What did you think? yeh it was a really tough paper, even the integration in question one (though very doable) was harder than usual. and the mechanics in q7 was a lot of work for the marks..

haha wow. i mean it wasnt that hard but still 84..

do 1993. The average was 46/120. Hardest ever, and the average for 2000 was 57.

k well for the conics one, redraw the diagram for part ii. The tangents to the ellipse can only occur if P and Q are vertically above one another. i found the probability part confusing ha. and sin@ = r/R (R being the radius of the sphere and r being the radius of the hoizontal circle)...

anyone done 03? the question 8 is ridiculous, probably need an A3 page for the integration by parts bit. Hopefully we dont get anything like that tomoz..

it wouldnt have influenced the exam, they were set and printed ages ago

about 1500-1700 depending on the time. If you get through multies and shorties in good time you can easily have 2 hours for the essays