Search results

thats what i wasn't sure...was if they sorted out the source of the fire in that one

it was a pretty good take of the stage version, and i was surprised will ferrell actually didn't hurt it

generally speaking, having sex if not ready to deal with the potential of getting pregnant.

it seems to be his significance is more just because its what is expected of you than anything else. or well, at least initially.

question is also...why do something you're not ready for the possible aftermath of?

however, there is still the fact that there is a big difference between things meant to keep order that are like crime, and other religious views that are more imposing and less related to protecting people from others that would do harm

no, but a friend of mine stopped talking to a couple girls he was friends with because his girlfriend at the time was jealous and insecure. and a psycho

well, the idea of things like thie hijab, which are entirely religious in nature, being part of the law of a state is definitly forcing those that aren't muslim to follow the same religious practices, or at least some of the same ones. and that was what i was saying was then a gov't forcing...

has it been resolved in the case of the school taken hostage what caused most of the deaths? i remember the last big incident was taking hostages in a moscow theatre, and most of the deaths came from russian forces trying to get the terrorists

was my first election...actually did vote for him based on platform. basicly though...my views always been...... it says a lot about state politics at the time that arnold schwarteneggar was an improvement

the thing is, though, there is no purely islamic country in the world. if you have the state pushing such laws, then you're forcing them on people that are not muslim as well, which is unfair, from my perspective. also, no theologican, but i would think it takes away from the religious...

i'm from southern california, just a short drive north from Los Angeles....bout 45 km or so, i'd reckon. and yeah, american accent, whatever that'd be, but i type more like an aussie

the issues not-that-bright and i were discussing were more things that tend to happen any theocracy, regardless of which religion or how it is run and from what you posted...it seems that the ottoman empire was not really a true caliphate, as it says they used the term for political purposes

s'ok. i'm just all disappointed i had to out myself to explain my credibility.

as i'm an american and all, i'm sort of aware of what we've got (i've spent a couple months in australia, looking to spend more, prob a year, either for school or working in sydney when i can manage it.)

yeah, but my point was only that the U.S. doesn't have a national ID card

ok, i meant for the general people to change it. the golden rule, "he who has the gold makes the rules" though

thats not at all what a social security card IS. a social security card is given either at birth in the u.s., and there is a similar number you get when you become a citizen or, i believe, become able to legally work in the u.s. prior to citizenship. its a requirement for a job because its part...

i believe the issue here would be that a theocracy would have laws in place that were basicly of the sense "god said this, its the law", whereas the idea behind democracy allows laws to become more fluid...for example, it has made it easier for women to get the vote. when you tie your laws to...

personally, i see them both on par with, say, greek mythology. written to give a basis for establishing laws or explaining things that people wanted to hear explained.