I think most Australians support filtering the filth on the internet. I myself have no qualms with the filter, I mean, unless you want to look at this vile stuff, or profit from it, then you have no real reason to oppose the filter.
To the vile mermen submerged in their sea of slime, who wade through it, gills exposed; thou shoult be caught by the in the great nets of goodness; you will be filtered and found guilty of your crimes. For we are free and we are rich. And that is WHY YOU attack us.
What foul word jumbles leak from that jumbled jejune mind of yours. 'Science' does not 'prove' any theory, it may only support (i.e corroborate) or disqualify a theory. However this 'god' notion of yours doesn't even qualify as a bad theory, nor weak hypothesis, it is simply a lazy thoughthole...
I hope that is not an attempt to appear literate, as it rather conclusively demonstrates that those of you with unpleasant minds give rise to only unpleasant thoughts, which are not to be taken notice of. No sir, you and your cretin pals will not stop this noble ban.
If you didn't have anything to hide you wouldn't be here. Your collaborating with other enablers to thwart the banning of such materials, plotting online, slithering with the snakes, festering with the maggots and sautéing in the cess pool of sympathisers.
Ah, but it is in the darkness of the shadow you degenerates cast that these pedophiles and torture porn operators flourish in. Stand down, enablers, and let light shine upon the dark labyrinths of which you stand guard.
Pretty sure you have to be overweight and generally unkempt to work in one of those Gaming outlets (greasy hands to fumble with peoples purchases is also a +)
Haha.... Why are you referencing such irrelevant people you dunce, you don't know shit about ontology, you hack, it' the 21th century, drag your dusty stone head out of the fucking 18th century.
Insofar you strike me as someone who has read none of the literature on the subject of morality/evolution. Clearly you have no understanding of evolution, so stop using the term as if you do.
Err, your definition of morality is as follows "is simply right or wrong conduct".
Hence, wrong conduct (i.e Murder), would satisfy your definition of 'morality'. I realize your not the brightest, little girl, but I didn't take you for a wicked 'murder is moral' Taliban sympathizer.
@lolokay...