Re: Discrete Maths Sem 2 2016
Another method: if gcd(a, b) = d, then by Bézout's identity, there exists integers x and y such that ax + by = d. Dividing through by d yields (a/d)x + (b/d)y = 1 because d cannot be 0. Then reverse Bézout's identity to conclude that gcd(a/d, b/d) = 1.
$Let $I = \int_0^1 x^m (1-x)^n dx $ and keep integrating by parts to reduce $x^m$ down to $x^0$,$ \\ \begin{align*} I &= \left[ -\frac{x^n(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1} \right]_0^1 + \frac{m}{n+1} \int_0^1 x^{m-1}(1-x)^{n+1} dx \\&= \frac{m}{n+\color{red}{1}}\int_0^1...
Sorry, I don't know this one. I forgot nearly all of this but try going through each step of the experiment and see if you can spot any inconsistencies that arise
Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying.
Pb(NO3)2 and PbSO4 coincidently have a mole ratio of 3:3, so 1:1. This does not mean you should always use the moles of a reactant (which supposedly has same mole ratio to the desired product) to find the moles of a product because it may be in...
That's finding the number of moles of Al2(SO4)3 and you cannot use this to find the moles of PbSO4 because it's the excess. You must use the limiting reagent to find the moles of PbSO4