Search results

I just said all the stuff about it not being accurate then like "if the student was able to reproduce these results consistently, it would be reliable, albeit at producing inaccuate results"

u dont have to do that specifically in this year's syllabus

cool thanks ionisation and dissociation are basically the same thing arent they? except that molecules ionise and ions dissociate (?)

For sulfruric acid, the first hydrogen ion completely dissociates, but what about the second? Does 'di/triprotic' mean that all hydrogen ions completely dissociate?

cool our teacher didnt say anything about new elements at all. The ones after actinides dont do anything to they? They just instantly die in the reactor. Is americium "recent"?

"process information from secondary sources to describe recent discoveries of elements" I guess that means unununonunoium and those crazy elements Has anyone prepared for this? How likely are they to turn "process information from secondary sources" dot points into exam questions?

I hate not having enough time, cos it seems they always want "more in depth" or "more detail", yet only 40 mins. What is the biggest joke of all is like 10 people at my school getting to use computers just for whinging and being bad/slow writers, and hence cranking out a million more perfectly...

You cant be as screwed as me, I ran out of time and had to stop at the end of my stimulus text. I found it quite hilarious. I still wrote about 9 pages, but what will they do about that? will i get like 5