Search results

Don't worry dude...i fucked up aswell..the sources section was really easy and i was thinking what a good exam it was...then i got to the harder questions and totally fucked up..i'll be lucky to pass. good luck to every1 else tho

I guess we will see when the results are put on the net, ask your teachers...they will say it was D.

Yeah i think it was a good exam, much better thean previous years. The multiple choice were too easy, the rest was good, the evaluate locust question was stupid, it was easy, all you had to to was tabulate the info that was in the articles with an overall evaluation. I did the human story...

c is definately not right, an organism cant change its characteristics to suits its current environment. <<<jey word there is current, and an organism can not change over one generation. My answer was d, that they evolved similar structures to similar environmental conditions. im 100% sure this...

My answers: 1.b 2.c 3.a 4.b 5.a 6.c 7.c 8.b 9.d 10.c 11.b 12.d 13.c 14.a 15.d Goodluck every1...

paper 1 was great. i screwed up paper 2 i think, i was supposed to do sustainable land managemtnt question, but decided to do plant management instead and i think i did betetr that i would have if i chose land management. i also did the animal management

I will try and het my head teachers answers tomorrow. my answers are as follows: 1.d 2.b 3.b 4.b 5.a 6.d 7.d 8.b 9.c 10.d 11.b 12.c 13.a 14.d 15.d 16.b 17.c 18.d 19.a 20.b I thought i had too many d's and b's, but they seem to compare well to everyone elses. goodluck...

I reckon overall, it was a shit exam, mutliple choice wasnt too bad, however, question 5 confused me : which of the sets of risk factors is common in both cvd and breast cancer and question 20: the graphs show the learning curves of a performer practicing two new skills. which best reflected the...

I did sport and physical activity in australia and sports med. they were quiet hard questions, the sports med ones were a joke.