Like I understand both curves intersect at x as they are the inverse and its way too hard to find the inverse but using x instead of the inverse wont give u the correct shaded area
I came across an integral that my teacher gave me to do. I have an answer but am unsure if my answer is correct. Other softwares (wolfram alpha and symbolab) are giving me different answers, but I suspect they are algebraically equivalent since they probably have different constants of...
I am pretty confused with my solution to this integration proof question. I feel like it isn't the right way to prove it.
d/dx (uv) = u(dv/dx)+v(du/dx)
take the integral with respect to x of both sides:
uv = ∫ u(dv/dx ) dx + ∫ v(du/dx) dx
therefore,
∫ u(dv/dx ) dx = uv - ∫ v(du/dx)...