Here’s how I would do it:View attachment 40745
does anyone know how to do this?
It only goes to n on the second one, whereas the first one goes to 2n, hence why it’s double the answerI think the formula is incorrect. As a counter-example: let n = 3, x = 1
Hold it; maybe I'm wrong!
Can you elaborate? Not sure which equation you’re saying is wrong and which sides you’re substituting intoI think the formula is incorrect. As a counter-example: let n = 3, x = 1
Hold it; maybe I'm wrong!
Oh nvm got itIt only goes to n on the second one, whereas the first one goes to 2n, hence why it’s double the answer
wait how do u minus the 2ncn, and still factor out a 2?Proof:
Hence the result (too tedious to type out the rest!)
Cause he counted it twicewait how do u minus the 2ncn, and still factor out a 2?
ye so he has one left in his expansion, so how does he end up with 2 again?Cause he counted it twice
He cancels out the double up, and then he has 1 of each left from 1 to 2nye so he has one left in his expansion, so how does he end up with 2 again?
(1 + 1)^2n has 2n+1 (odd number!) of terms. The expression 2nC0 + 2nC1 + . . . + 2nCn has n+1 terms. By adding an additional 2nCn to the remaining expression, I make it equal to the 1st half. I did not notice this at the beginning and that's why I thought the identity was incorrect at first.@Drongoski why did u have two of 2nCn in the first place?