Case study - appeasement!!! (1 Viewer)

[Megsy387]

Any lucky ppl doing appeasement went to join forces and conquer?

Im gonna concentrate on Churchill & Taylor...any suggestions ona 3rd with good historiography?????

 

[sif not 99]

the other class at my school is doing it, ppl from there checks these forums, hint hint tristan help out dude

 

[Megsy387]

anks s

Who ever tristan is please get in touch!!!!!!!

Sif....can u pass my email onto anyone in the class?

meg131084@yahoo.com.au

thankyou!!!

 

[philbert_frog]

howdy i'm tristan.

yeah i do appeasement..

unsure of historians at the moment ... will know very soon ... i'll msg then ...

prob taylor, gilbert, eubank or rock --> but they dun really talk about french appeasement, which is a pain. you got any on that?

hope that helps...

what did you do for your project??
when's your trial?

 

[Megsy387]

Hey....Thankgod you replied.

Nope, nothing on french appeasement....we havent beent old that we need anything on that.

My trials week 4, thurs. Are u doing the catholic trial????

My project was on mandela....u?????

Anything you do have on ur historians, let me know.
Thanks

 

[philbert_frog]

Originally posted by Megsy387
Nope, nothing on french appeasement....we havent been told that we need anything on that.

Hey, its mentioned in the syllabus that we need it:
"Option 19: Appeasement Peace or War?
Principal focus: students investigate changing interpretations of the evidence
relating to the policy of appeasement.
Students examine the approaches to history and interpretations (including recent
historiography) that have resulted in historical debate in the areas of:
the origins of appeasement and relationship to earlier policies
British and French approaches to appeasement in the 1930s
international reactions to appeasement in the 1930s
appeasement and the origins of the Second World War
the extent of the successes and/or failures of appeasement."

Originally posted by Megsy387
My trials week 4, thurs. Are u doing the catholic trial????

Yep I am... Actually I think my teacher has written her own exam...I can't remember, I'll find out though - not that it really makes a difference as we don't know the contents of either. Its on week 4 thurs though.

Originally posted by Megsy387
My project was on mandela....u?????

Mine was on Chairman Mao and the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976). Thank god its over!

Cya

 

[Ishmael]

Glibert & Gott's 'The Appeasers' is a boring book that I hate. Gilbert, however, is a good historian to study since he changes his opinion from what it was in 'The Appeasers' to a more moderate/revisionist approach after the opening of the British Government Archives during the Chamberlain period. I believe his revisionist work is called 'The Roots of Appeasement.'

Andrew Crozier is a great historian, IMO, because he addresses all the points on the syllabus in his book. He's also useful because he had access to the records, other works and aims his work at a Sith Form audiance.

AJP Taylor and Namier are great because of their narrow-minded and oftentimes unfactual rantings

Ishy