True true... Especially with 6-8 minutes after hearing the last playing of the pieces to write a 4 mark something about techniques, not much time to think! Ended up using some essay time to 'finish' the answers to those questions...cayte said:The format doesn't really lend itself to in-depth responses as you're no doubt aware!!
Ooh never thought of it like that!neonazi said:im guessin if they say other music in the past, they want u to talk about music u studied in ur additional topic, which lies in a time period before the mandatory topic. thats how i would interpret that anyways.
was that a sarcastic remark?? if it is, i applaud u cos im one of the most sarcastic fellas there is, and if it isnt...i dont know wat to say!?!?chepas said:Ooh never thought of it like that!
nothin to be sorry about mate.chepas said:^^ LOL. No wasn't sarcastic, I'm sorry...
Though sarcasm and dad jokes are my gifts in real life...
^^ Yes yes... Breached the line between music being 'organised sound', and just noise...timyates_87 said:OMG the George Crumb piece sucked serious shit, i was the only one who could follow it. ahhh it was SO SHIT
hehe yeh it was the last piece in the Music 2 paper, the "Dark Angels" bullshit one that sounded like there was an angle grinder in it. i blocked my ears through that CRAP.CarinaT said:Which is the George Crumb pieve that everyone is hating on?