RogueAcademic
Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 859
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Considering that it is one of the major points considered when kicking him out of contention for the Olympics, how would you feel if D'Arcy had been allowed to compete, and what if he had gone on to win a gold medal?
I think the AOC made the right decision kicking him off, there would've been no justice or moral culpability in allowing him the opportunity to attempt to elevate himself to a position of sport's highest level of achievement.
And besides, he has a court hearing pending, which may end up seeing him convicted and imprisoned. You can't have an 'olympic hero' winning a medal and then coming home and sent to jail.
But doesn't that logic fly in the face of "innocent before proven guilty"?
Anyway..
One would hope he has some remorse and regret for his very stupid act when he king-hit Simon Cowley in the face at a bar, especially with the Aussie swimmers winning medals and breaking olympic/world records in Beijing as we speak.
If not, maybe a conviction and some jail time might just convince him to grow up.
I think the AOC made the right decision kicking him off, there would've been no justice or moral culpability in allowing him the opportunity to attempt to elevate himself to a position of sport's highest level of achievement.
And besides, he has a court hearing pending, which may end up seeing him convicted and imprisoned. You can't have an 'olympic hero' winning a medal and then coming home and sent to jail.
But doesn't that logic fly in the face of "innocent before proven guilty"?
Anyway..
One would hope he has some remorse and regret for his very stupid act when he king-hit Simon Cowley in the face at a bar, especially with the Aussie swimmers winning medals and breaking olympic/world records in Beijing as we speak.
If not, maybe a conviction and some jail time might just convince him to grow up.
Last edited: