• Want to take part in this year's BoS Trials event for Maths and/or Business Studies?
    Click here for details and register now!
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

full fee paying... (1 Viewer)

V

vanbasten

Guest
Are the fees quoted on a yearly basis? (ie $18000 for combined law)

And, is anyone can help me, what are the payment options if you are a fee paying student?
 

santaslayer

Active Member
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
7,816
Location
La La Land
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
vanbasten said:
Are the fees quoted on a yearly basis? (ie $18000 for combined law)

And, is anyone can help me, what are the payment options if you are a fee paying student?
Yes, yearly. I'd doubt many people could afford it if it was based on a per session system. :p
 

Mambomeg

yay! custom!!!
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
852
Location
studying....always studying
Gender
Female
HSC
2002
yes its yearly, but its based on how many units of study you do, so if you dont do the full 48 credit points, you only pay for those that you do. ie- in first semester you'd have to pay $9000 up front if you were doing 24 credit points (a normal full time load), then in second semester you'd pay the rest.

You have to pay up front, at the beginning of each semester. but from next year there will be fee-help, which will work in the same way as HECS in that you can defer your payment until after you have finished your course. Heres the website
http://www.hecs.gov.au/pubs/fee_help_2005/contents.htm

hope that helps!
 

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Will they increase the fee-help threshold beyond $50k as they have suggested?

That question will only be relevant if the Liberals remain in power, though, I think.
 

Mambomeg

yay! custom!!!
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
852
Location
studying....always studying
Gender
Female
HSC
2002
i dont know, but in my course, $50,000 wouldnt even pay for the first two years, so whats the point of that? you'd think with a $5 billion surplus the government would stop being so stingy and actually use it for something worthwhile.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top