Posting this for a friend.
Let's assume that someone is graduating this year and they are sitting on a Distinction average. They have decent extra curriculars and seem to be a 'well rounded' person.
Assume further that the candidate wants to secure a decent role in an investment bank. Problem is, ibanks have cut back on recruitment, leaving many of the $80k-ish grad roles very thin on the ground.
There are less opportunities going, so suddenly the Distinction average and typical extra curriculars don't cut it. Simply, the employers can be more choosey.
Now let's assume that the candidate has performed very well in a certain extra curricular activity such as Poker. The candidate has net winnings over $80k and has written a computer program that is used and endorsed by the winner of a World Series of Poker main event. Further, assume that the candidate has written an academic paper on poker/game theory that has been published in academic circles.
My question is, should the candidate mention poker in their resume and/or in their interviews?
Cons:
- HR could view gambling as a degenerate hobby and kill the application immediately.
- Interviewers could view the applicant as non risk-averse.
Pros:
- Gets application noticed and differentiates from other run of the mill applications.
- Poker skills could be viewed as transferable to certain roles, e.g. sales and trading, risk management, quant analytics.
In summary, some people at some firms would kill the the application at the mere mention of gambling. Others may find it deeply interesting.
Thing about "interesting" items on your CV is that the variance of outcomes is pushed up. In general this is good because employment opportunities are options, and as the holder of these options, we would like our option volatility to go up. However, this assume that SOME employers will find it attractive. Maybe this assumption isn't that solid? In a post subprime world, risk aversion is all the rage now...
So, poker on the resume? Yay or nay?
Let's assume that someone is graduating this year and they are sitting on a Distinction average. They have decent extra curriculars and seem to be a 'well rounded' person.
Assume further that the candidate wants to secure a decent role in an investment bank. Problem is, ibanks have cut back on recruitment, leaving many of the $80k-ish grad roles very thin on the ground.
There are less opportunities going, so suddenly the Distinction average and typical extra curriculars don't cut it. Simply, the employers can be more choosey.
Now let's assume that the candidate has performed very well in a certain extra curricular activity such as Poker. The candidate has net winnings over $80k and has written a computer program that is used and endorsed by the winner of a World Series of Poker main event. Further, assume that the candidate has written an academic paper on poker/game theory that has been published in academic circles.
My question is, should the candidate mention poker in their resume and/or in their interviews?
Cons:
- HR could view gambling as a degenerate hobby and kill the application immediately.
- Interviewers could view the applicant as non risk-averse.
Pros:
- Gets application noticed and differentiates from other run of the mill applications.
- Poker skills could be viewed as transferable to certain roles, e.g. sales and trading, risk management, quant analytics.
In summary, some people at some firms would kill the the application at the mere mention of gambling. Others may find it deeply interesting.
Thing about "interesting" items on your CV is that the variance of outcomes is pushed up. In general this is good because employment opportunities are options, and as the holder of these options, we would like our option volatility to go up. However, this assume that SOME employers will find it attractive. Maybe this assumption isn't that solid? In a post subprime world, risk aversion is all the rage now...
So, poker on the resume? Yay or nay?