Its not bad at all dw, im rked 1 in 4u and i've read the second last book too, so i can c where ur coming from. i dont think your writing is bad its intriguing but its not effective if your trying to 'mimic' in a way, modernism. Modernism needs to reflect a almost unravelling mind u need more subjectivity, interiority and rejection of the realism. avoid cliches too and try to mimic this through an almost quasi but not entirely full fledged structural fracturing since thats more post modern. explore the pysche of the persona undergoing the experince rather than delaying it to the end which ends up being short and thus cliche. Your technical aspect is good, eg use of susatined speech and such, but only use it to explore the dictomy that arises in the relationship. The sugreon guy thus needs to speech more clinically and scholastically, whilst the lay subject needs to have fragmented thought reflected in his speech, thus answering the modernist sense of interiority.