LAW205/6: Dont do the readings, dont listen to the iLecture, just read her transcripts (if she hasn't told you about them yet, email her and ask). All she does is read those damn transcripts, so once you have those you are set my friend. I only used the text for research and answering the final exam. And, its not all theory, just the beginning stuff.
LAW314/5: Never listened to the iLecture because Kelly's voice put me to sleep every time. I didnt do the readings either. You can get away with doing jack all, because the essay and final exam tell you
exactly where to read to answer the questions (which aren't challenging to begin with).
LAW204: This I cant really remember, but I did listen to the iLectures and made pretty comprehensive notes. But I think we used a different book to the one that Spencer uses. Just a note, know the details of the cases, because some of the time its some minute detail that distinguishes one mistake case (or duress or non est factum etc) from the others, which comes in very handy in the final exam.
Edit: IWR, being a two subject bandit sounds fantastic to me! But, you will then have an extra subject to squeeze in somewhere else. It sucks he hasn't replied. I was taking to a friend, and she told me that the International law essay is due on the 20-something of April (just so you know... thats like two weeks after remedies).