I thought that it was a good exam. I loved the source and was able to use all my historians in one way or another. I thought that the question in 1 was very open as well, and it was a matter of using the source well.
I found teh second one a little bit harder, only because I forgot about the quote until i was quite a bit onto my case study..
I thought the exam would be easy like the trials...I was so wrong. And I think I forgot to mention Becker in the second one so I am totally screwed!! I got 1st in extension at my school and yet i found that exam so hard and I was the only one!! Totally screwed!!
Well i managed to screw up yet another exam (most basically)...goodbye Uni!!
Pretty average. Blitzed section II, but i thought section one was narrow minded and almost stupid. There were so many other great exerts they could have chosen from such a mammoth pool of source information.