• YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

I need help! (1 Viewer)

coyazayo

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
58
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Hi I have a question I am stuck with and I need quick help!

Find the value(s) of n if
N(xsquared-5x+6)-7x+3xsquared+3>0 for all real x.


Thank you :)
 

VBN2470

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
440
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
We can express the above as a quadratic in x, after expanding and simplifying we should have the LHS equal to , and we want to find the values of n such that for all real x. This means if we sketch our quadratic, it should lie above the x-axis for all real x, which means the quadratic has no real roots. Hence, (standard 2U theory). Simplifying this gives us the inequality and so solving for this inequality for n, we have that .
 

coyazayo

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
58
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Hi but I don't understand when you said that if you sketch the graph, it is above zero. Do you mean the entire graph is above 0 or part of the graph is above zero?
 

VBN2470

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
440
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
Entire graph is above the x-axis, since the questions states the quadratic must be positive for all real x.
 

coyazayo

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
58
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
So if the graph is above the x axis, it covers all x values but if the graph touches the x axis it doesn't cover all x values since it doesn't include the x intercept values because the graph is> 0 instead of it being greater than or equal to zero.
Is that what you were trying to convey? :)
 

coyazayo

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
58
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
So if the graph touches the x axis, the values between the 2 intercepts (f(x)) is negative so can't be true. Is that what you are saying? Sorry, for the constant questioning
 

VBN2470

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
440
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
So if the graph is above the x axis, it covers all x values but if the graph touches the x axis it doesn't cover all x values since it doesn't include the x intercept values because the graph is> 0 instead of it being greater than or equal to zero.
Is that what you were trying to convey? :)
Yes, the inequality states that the graph is strictly positive for all real x

So if the graph touches the x axis, the values between the 2 intercepts (f(x)) is negative so can't be true. Is that what you are saying? Sorry, for the constant questioning
Well 'touching' the x-axis refers to the graph of the quadratic being tangent to the x-axis at one point, which means the graph will consist of two equal real roots and so the value of the quadratic will equal 0 at those points (roots). This does not the satisfy the condition that the quadratic must be strictly positive. On the other hand, if the graph crosses (which is what you're asking) the x-axis, it (the quadratic) will consist of two distinct real roots. So, just like you said, if it crosses the x-axis then it will mean that the quadratic will take on negative values for some x values, and (again) won't satisfy the condition that the quadratic is strictly positive for all real x. Of course, the coefficient of the leading term must be positive for the graph to be above the x-axis, in this case , but this condition is already satisfied since we found n to lie in the interval .
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top