MedVision ad

IntegrationInduction (1 Viewer)

kami

An iron homily
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
4,265
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Hi, I know I probably should know how to do this but unfortunately I don't really understand the question - would one of you be so helpful enough as to explain to me whatever I've missed?

(i)Explain why, for α>0,
∫(0 to 1) xα. ex.dx < 3/(α + 1)

(You may assume that e<3)

(ii) Show, via induction, that for n= 0, 1, 2,....there exist integers an and b n such that
∫(0 to 1)xn. ex.dx = an + bn.

Thank you to anyone who can help.:)
 
Last edited:

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kami said:
Hi, I know I probably should know how to do this but unfortunately I don't really understand the question - would one of you be so helpful enough as to explain to me whatever I've missed?

(i)Explain why, for α>0,
∫(0 to 1) xα. ex.dx < 3/(α + 1)

(You may assume that e<3)
For that bit you know that 1 &le; e<sup>x</sup> &le; e < 3 (for 0 < x < 1) hence:

e<sup>x</sup> < 3

x<sup>&alpha;</sup>e<sup>x</sup> &le; 3x<sup>&alpha;</sup> (since x &ge; 0)

&there4; &int; (0 to 1) x<sup>&alpha;</sup>e<sup>x</sup> dx < 3&int; (0 to 1) x<sup>&alpha;</sup> dx = 3/(&alpha; + 1)

&there4; &int; (0 to 1) x<sup>&alpha;</sup>e<sup>x</sup> dx < 3/(&alpha; + 1)
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kami said:
(ii) Show, via induction, that for n= 0, 1, 2,....there exist integers an and b n such that
∫(0 to 1)xn. ex.dx = an + bn.
Skipping over the n=1 case (and letting S<sub>n</sub> represent the proposition), assume true for n= k so:

&int; (0 to 1) x<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup> dx = a<sub>k</sub> + b<sub>k</sub>e ...(1)

... then when n= k+1

&int; (0 to 1) x<sup>k+1</sup>e<sup>x</sup> dx

= [x<sup>k+1</sup>e<sup>x</sup>](0 to 1) - (k+1)&int; (0 to 1) x<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup> dx ...(using int. by parts)

= [e - 0] - (k+1)&int; (0 to 1) x<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup> dx

= e - (k+1)(a<sub>k</sub> + b<sub>k</sub>e) ... using (1)

= -(k+1)a<sub>k</sub> + (1 - (k+1)b<sub>k</sub>)e

= a<sub>k+1</sub> + b<sub>k+1</sub>e (since all the terms above [except e] are integers]

hence S<sub>k</sub> ==> S<sub>k+1</sub> etc...
 
Last edited:

kami

An iron homily
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
4,265
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I think I get it now, thanks KFunk!:)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top