A quick area of thought, under you response to this post, tell me why you care about you HSC, and view other peopls reasons as to why they care.
***
in response to another thread; i think its called "how smart are you" or something, many people were throwing up different ideas about how smart they think they are.
i think students sometimes question the fairness of the HSC. it seems that if you are "smarter" its easier to do better. it seems unfair that when two people who put in the same amount of time and effort into their work do not always recieve the same results....
lets think about the idea of being "smart"
i think you are smart in year 12 if you work hard and efficiently. the HSC is designed to favour all people, not just those who are gifted. if you work, you can achieve better results than a smart kid who dosent work. A smart student will realise his natural abilitys compared to other peoples and will work as hard as he/she needs to rank first in their cohort. a naturally brilliant kid who sits on the couch is not necessarily smart, infact they are stupid, if they do not use their potential. i often see average kids beating many of the more gifted kids just beacuse they work more at home.
if you are naturally smart, and by that i mean you have a high IQ (130+), and you go to a resonable school and have a decent area to work at home, there is no reason as to why you cannot get a UAI of 95+
i want to keep it open for comments, but my 2 cents on the systems is this:
i think the HSC is fair.
you will get the mark you deserve.
how smart you are is shown through your results (which in the HSC is only obtained through hard work)
i dont know anyone who dosent work and receives good marks. if they claim they do i assure you they are lieing and have some self esteem issues.
goodluck all and thankyou for listening.
***
in response to another thread; i think its called "how smart are you" or something, many people were throwing up different ideas about how smart they think they are.
i think students sometimes question the fairness of the HSC. it seems that if you are "smarter" its easier to do better. it seems unfair that when two people who put in the same amount of time and effort into their work do not always recieve the same results....
lets think about the idea of being "smart"
i think you are smart in year 12 if you work hard and efficiently. the HSC is designed to favour all people, not just those who are gifted. if you work, you can achieve better results than a smart kid who dosent work. A smart student will realise his natural abilitys compared to other peoples and will work as hard as he/she needs to rank first in their cohort. a naturally brilliant kid who sits on the couch is not necessarily smart, infact they are stupid, if they do not use their potential. i often see average kids beating many of the more gifted kids just beacuse they work more at home.
if you are naturally smart, and by that i mean you have a high IQ (130+), and you go to a resonable school and have a decent area to work at home, there is no reason as to why you cannot get a UAI of 95+
i want to keep it open for comments, but my 2 cents on the systems is this:
i think the HSC is fair.
you will get the mark you deserve.
how smart you are is shown through your results (which in the HSC is only obtained through hard work)
i dont know anyone who dosent work and receives good marks. if they claim they do i assure you they are lieing and have some self esteem issues.
goodluck all and thankyou for listening.