IVF budget cuts (1 Viewer)

mahuligan

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
196
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
IVF Cuts Will Crush the Dreams of Hopeful Women and Families, Australia
28 Apr 2005

Australian Medical Association (AMA) President, Dr Bill Glasson, said today that the Government's speculated Budget cut to IVF treatment is a callous attack on the dreams of hopeful women and families, which further diminishes the Government's health credentials.

Dr Glasson said coming so soon after the broken promise on the Medicare safety net, the Government's hard-won credibility on health policy is crumbling.

"The Government is making health policy on the run on the advice of Treasury bureaucrats ahead of the May Budget, and it shows," Dr Glasson said.

"The IVF decision defies commonsense as it will harm a vulnerable section of the community for a reported paltry Budget saving of $7 million a year.

"People do not undertake IVF treatments lightly. It is a highly emotional and expensive decision that sets women and families on an uncertain path to a cherished dream - a child or children denied them by other methods.

"There is no place for misguided Government intervention and penny-pinching in this important doctor-patient relationship. Every IVF patient has individual situations, circumstances and needs but one thing they do have in common is a desperate desire to have a child.

"The Government's decision fails any test of equity, fairness or compassion and must be ditched immediately."

Dr Glasson said it was only a few weeks ago that Treasurer Peter Costello was photographed in the papers surrounded by babies and proclaiming a baby boom.

"Now the Treasurer is being discriminatory on who should be part of that baby boom - on miserly Treasury advice and generalisations about the number and nature of IVF cycles without a thought for a patient's individual circumstances or condition.

"If the Treasurer goes ahead with his IVF budget cuts, women and families with hopes of a miracle baby in the pumpkin patch have another threat to their dreams - Peter, Peter, the pumpkin eater," Dr Glasson said.
im suprised there isnt a thread already here...so what do you all think? Do you think its fair to cut the funding or do you believe that IVF is an 'elective' treatment that shouldnt be paid for using taxpayers money? interested to hear your opinions..
 

iamsickofyear12

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,960
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
mahuligan said:
im suprised there isnt a thread already here...so what do you all think? Do you think its fair to cut the funding or do you believe that IVF is an 'elective' treatment that shouldnt be paid for using taxpayers money? interested to hear your opinions..
I think it is elective and shouldn't be paid for by taxpayers.
 

Abbeygale

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
329
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
An IVF treatment is around $4500. Just in case anyone's wondering.

I don't know about funding it ith taxpayer money. But I remember reading that capping IVF cycles at 3 per year per woman probably won't save money- if the couples feel under pressure to succeed quickly, they'll try to hedge their bets by having more cells implanted = more multiple births = more premmies and complications = more cost at the maternity end. Also, if couples have to wait a full year to try again, the woman will be a year older and the same cost cycle described above will happen- higher risk of complications/birth defects.
 

modelzsuck

Kylie
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
532
Location
Upper Hunter
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
iamsickofyear12 said:
I think it is elective and shouldn't be paid for by taxpayers.

Yeah I agree with this, if the people are that desperate to have children why should tax payers have to pay every time they go to have it done??? And I think after 6 times your pretty much gauranteed that you cant have children, I dont know what everyone is so angry about.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top