Medentry vs F2F section 3 (1 Viewer)

[angrygeorge]

Hey guys,

I've noticed that section 3 in medentry is a lot harder than F2F, and that in medenrty they seem to focus ALOT more on pick the middle questions which usually involve really weird patterns, unlike F2F which generally evens it out a bit in terms of types of questions but the rules are generally easily applicable.

I was just hoping for anyone who has done the umat could give me some insight into what the section 3 was really like, as hard as medentry, as easy as F2F, or in between.

Thanks

 

[Dream Meteor]

The actual UMAT does have ALOT of pick the middle ones (at least in the year I sat it - 2008). The patterns are alot more consistent and non-dodgy. There were no "this to that" type of questions you sometimes see in Face2Face and MedEntry and very little number ones.

 

[angrygeorge]

Ahk thanks heaps for the info.