Michelson and Morley Experiment (1 Viewer)

Fluffy Ewok

New Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
5
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
Hey,

Does any one have notes/infomation/links on the following:

1)Background/Motivation
2)Method
3)Results
4)Interpretation of results
5)Implications of results to morden physics

Breif or detailed, any thing that would help....

Thanks.
 

richz

Active Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,348
seriously, can u get off ur lazy ass and d/l syllabus summaries and read them.

eg. look wat i found :rolleyes:

Outline the features of the aether model for the transmission of light

James Clerk Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism proposed that light was an electromagnetic wave, and that it had a constant speed, c (3 x 108 ms-1), irrespective of the frame of reference of an observer. 19th Century physics only knew about waves that needed a medium to travel in, therefore light was assumed to travel through a medium too, named aether, and that the reason why light’s speed was constant was because it is measured with respect to the aether. Properties
of the aether included:
- it was transparent
- it flowed easy
- it does not offer resistance to masses
- it was stiff, so that light, which had a great speed, could travel through it
- it was elastic, to support and propagate light waves
Many of these characteristics were conflicting, but without aether, no other explanation could be
thought of. Therefore aether must have existed, being an absolute frame of reference (at rest).

Describe and evaluate the Michelson-Morley attempt to measure the relative velocity of the Earth through the aether

If aether existed, then the Earth should be moving through it, and a flow of aether should be experienced called aether wind. This is similar to the way wind is ‘created’ when a car is moving fast on a windless day. Sticking your hand out, you will be able to feel wind. Because of the properties of aether, extremely sensitive apparatus were needed to measure the relative velocity of the Earth through the aether. Michelson and Morley tried to measure the relative velocity of the Earth through the aether, by measuring the difference in the speeds of light beams when rotating the apparatus, which changed the direction of the light beam relative to the aether. It would have been impossible to measure the time difference between light, because it is so small, so they used the effect of interference of light. The apparatus involved a light ray travelling to a half-silvered mirror, which would split the beam into two directions, one into the aether, and the other against it. These two beams get reflected back by two mirrors and the two recombine at the interferometer. From here, an interference pattern is produced, appearing as a series of light bands in an eyepiece. If aether wind existed, when the apparatus was rotated, the eyepiece should see a shift in the light bands, and the relative velocity of the Earth through the aether could be measured. However, no shift was observed ever, no matter when and where the apparatus was tested, and no evidence for aether was found, famously called the ‘null’ result. No motion of the Earth relative to the aether was detectable.

Discuss the role of the Michelson-Morley experiments in making determinations aboutcompeting theories
The Michelson-Morley experiment detected no aether was present, and the null-result was a great mystery of physics. Many people tried to explain and keep the aether model alive by adapting the theory. One suggestion was that the Earth dragged the aether along with it, but this was shown to be incorrect. G.F Fitzgerald and H.A Lorentz both, independently, suggested that the length of the arms of the apparatus contract in the direction of the motion through the aether. As the contracted, the time changes cancel out, explaining why no shift was observed. At the time, no evidence supported of refuted this theory, but in 1979 it was shown that the length doesn’t contract. But long before this, Einstein’s special theory of relativity replaced the Lorentz- Fitzgerald theory. Although Einstein did not develop the theory specifically to answer the null result, it did succeed in explaining that the aether did not exist.

Thnx to acmilan
 

Fluffy Ewok

New Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
5
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
oh kool didnt know stuff like that was in there.
Thanks very much!
 

M-turkey

Zoom Zoom
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
262
Location
Tuggeranong ACT
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Heh,

Have a read of this, it's apparently support for the Flat Earth theory through Michelson-Morley...


In classical physics, ether was assumed to be a ephemeral substance which permeated all matter. This omnipresent medium was that through which visible light and other electromagnetic waves were supposed to have traveled. It was assumed to have qualities which now seem rather bizarre - too bizarre, in fact, to be allowed to exist, by Efimovich's teachings. So in 1887, two American scientists, operating under the Efimovich-based assumption that the Earth was moving through outer space and not the fixed center of the Universe, conducted an experiment to "prove" whether or not ether actually existed.

In this experiment, the general idea was to try to calculate the absolute speed of the earth relative to the fixed ether. In a sense, they would emit a light pulse, and calculate how far it "trailed" behind the earth, much like tossing a napkin out the window of a moving car to calculate the car's speed. It was assumed that, if ether existed, the light pulse would fall back in one direction, giving the physicists a tangible "absolute" speed of the earth. Their calculated speed: Zero.

Yes, scientists Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley were baffled by this, wondering how the Earth could be sitting in one spot, while every aspect of the teachings of Grigori Efimovich indicated that the planet must be orbiting its own sun, and therefore must be moving at least with a critical orbital velocity. Moving quickly to avoid having to admit that they were wrong, they were able to instead "infer" from their results that the ether must not exist, and that light must propagate through no medium at all (impossible for a wave by the very definition of a wave). Their inference was generally accepted by the scientific community (save a few notable exceptions, including Hendrik A. Lorentz) and the "ridiculous" notion of ether was thrown out.

But light waves would still require a medium for transmission, and the actual purpose of the experiment was to determine the existence of that medium. The results speak for themselves: the Earth does not move. And even if the Earth did, the problems inherent in keeping it moving through this light medium called ether are overwhelmingly supportive of "Flat-Earth" theory.
 

M-turkey

Zoom Zoom
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
262
Location
Tuggeranong ACT
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Pitty the Flat Earth theory still has a SUN orbiting Earth. Basically all the statement would support is a static universe...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top