One or two ecosystems for geo extended response? (1 Viewer)

[oscarhar]

When extended response questions are vague and do not specify ONE or TWO ecosystems at risk, is it fine to just talk in depth about one ecosystem? For example, the 2023 and 2020 questions asked about ecosystems:

2023: To what extent have humans had negative impacts on ecosystems?

2020: Assess the vulnerability and resilience of ecosystems at risk.

Is it fine to only talk about coral reefs for example, and is 20/20 still achievable if you do?

 

[bruhmoment.]

When extended response questions are vague and do not specify ONE or TWO ecosystems at risk, is it fine to just talk in depth about one ecosystem? For example, the 2023 and 2020 questions asked about ecosystems:

2023: To what extent have humans had negative impacts on ecosystems?

2020: Assess the vulnerability and resilience of ecosystems at risk.

Is it fine to only talk about coral reefs for example, and is 20/20 still achievable if you do?

you would defo have to talk about 2, see how it doesn't say 'ecosystem'. I have seen a few questions where they have specified, "at least one ecosystem at risk" wherein u can still attain full marks by only doing one ecosystem.