Yeah, but syllabus maths would be preferable. Thanks anyway though.factors are not nice, you will need to use the cubic formula:
Cubic Formula -- from Wolfram MathWorld
you mean *rational*If it has any real solutions, you could begin with testing factors such as 5/2, 1/2, 5 etc
That's what I'm assuming it is, but do you know an easy way to do it?No, I meant real...It could easily have an irrational factor
Every poly nomial factorizes..In the HSC they load it so that you get a nice rational factor (a cubic doesn't usually factorize so nicely!).. and that's why trying those numbers work.. but for your original cubic, the factors are not nice so you'll need to use the cubic formula.Yeah I tried -5/2, -1/2 etc.
By fundamental theorem there has to be at least one root as complex roots come in conjugate pairs.
Our teacher wrote this question on the board and then she realised that it was supposed to be -3z^2 in the actual question instead of +3z^2. But the guys in our class were thinking logically that the above question should be able to be factorised too.
Yes and No.. the actual steps doesn't use much beyond year 10 advanced maths + complex number knowledge, roughly:yeah we got that one easily but i was just wodnering if the other, original one, is doable with syllabus mathematics
Excellent! Thank you so much! Same to you khorne!Yes and No.. the actual steps doesn't use much beyond year 10 advanced maths + complex number knowledge, roughly:
1. divide through by 2.
2. let z = x - 1/2, substitute and you will get the equation: x^3 + 13/4 x + 3/4 = 0
3. do another subsitution, letting x = w - 13/(12w) you will get
w^6 + 3/4 w^3 - 2197/1728 = 0, this is a quadratic in w^3 which you can solve,
giving w^3 = 1/72 * [ - 27 +- 2*sqrt(1830) ] or w = cubert(1/72 * [ - 27 +- 2*sqrt(1830) ]), note that there are 6 possible values for w (every number has 3 cube roots)
4. from each w you can get an x and hence z. there will some repeats leaving you with 3 roots.
5. write down the factorization